To discuss your weekly readings of books, textbooks and papers.
I'm started readings some Chekhov's short-stories. First one was “The Kiss”.
To discuss your weekly readings of books, textbooks and papers.
I'm started readings some Chekhov's short-stories. First one was “The Kiss”.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I've been reading Humans: From the Beginning. It's an interesting book about all of prehistory, basically charting human development from our ape-like ancestors up to (and I think including) the middle bronze ages. I'm only like 10% through the book so far, and the author is discussing the various Homo species - the chapter I'm currently reading is about their spread in east Asia, including these hobbit-like people Homo florienses or something like that, which we think got isolated on an island and over hundreds of generations shrank in stature (and significantly in brain size ).
Interestingly, it seems like Homo erectus was probably around in this region all the way up until 10-20k years ago, and likely interbred with early Homo sapiens. I wonder if that's part of the reason Asians are shorter, but I still haven't gotten to the part of the book on Homo sapiens yet so I'll need to keep reading to find out.
I do recommend the book, though. It's not too dry but is fairly well researched and up-to-date (including discoveries from just the past few years), and all the potential findings are backed by why we believe them and alternative theories, since there's just so much uncertainty in the field.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!biology
But wasn't Homo Erectus around the same size as Homo Sapiens? I remember reading about a H. Erectus fossil found being around 180cm tall
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Homo Erectus was on average 200% taller and 50% more girthy than Homo Sapiens
!coomers !growers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
this is not supported by fossil evidence!!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
They were definitely taller in stature to Homo habilis (and almost certainly smarter), but not quite as tall as modern Homo sapiens, at least on average. Although there seems to have been pretty significant regional differences. The author discusses how Homo ergaster is sometimes used to refer to an African variant of Homo erectus, but he rejects it and uses Homo erectus for both, prefacing with "Asian" or "African" as necessary.
Apparently there's quite a bit of drama about this kind of thing because there's very little fossil evidence of early hominins (up until a decade ago probably all known fossils in the world would have fit in the back of a single pickup truck). So there are a lot of assumptions that have to be made, and most relationships between species are not clear (ie which ones evolved from which), and even whether specific fossils are the same of different species is uncertain. He talks about "splitters" who think there are more different species and "lumpers" who try to merge fossils into the same species.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The Curse of Lono - Hunter S Thompson
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Curse_of_Lono
One of his rarer books, it's pretty short and basically fear and loathing in Hawaii covering a marathon
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I admit those Jacobean era dialogues are hard to follow.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
im reading this thread rn
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Hai c*nts, I haven't been here for over half a year.
Finished La Place by Annie Ernaux (excellent), All the Names by José Saramago (superb), Zone of Intrest by Amis (didn't even know they made a movie about it, that's why it was pushed to the front of library display, and I wanted to check out another Amis' work after Dead Babies (mid)), currently reading Open Secrets by Munro. Good writing, meh stories (so far).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm curious about her works. Have you read other books by Ernaux?
“The Zone of Interest” is very good btw.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes, it is. I didn't want to confused people putting my so eloquent verdict next to Dead Babies' mid. Interesting that they have the same structure, maybe it's how Amis wrote (too early to tell), a chapter-for-character. Gives lots of space for development and reader's understanding.
No, this is the first one. I think all she wrote was in autobiographical mode and this is probably first autobiographical writing I ever finished. La Place resonated with me so much I understood what people mean when they say "literally me". She has a perfect serious to funny ratio, feel honest and interesting. Will I pick up something else? Probably. Will it hit as hard as Le Palce? Probably not.
But try it, from what I saw most of her works are rather short.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Th Collapse of Complex Societies - Joseph A. Tainter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sounds interesting, does he talks about the Maya?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It do in fact.
Just started so only a couple chapters in
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Still master and margarita, @Communist_spez is almost finishing it. @Communist_spez will read paradise lost next
@Communist_spez stand with ukraine dying
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Just read No Longer Human and I need more japanese books
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I read 73 books in a nine month period so i started over again with the Bible
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Finished Cannery Row, it was OK but not as good as To a God Unknown.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Listening to a book about running science. It hasn't made me a better runner but it's made me run more
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Out camping, final book of the Dark Tower series.
He's really going overboard with giving everything two or three different AU names.
The ka-tet, following kef, approached Duvon-Tor, known by the locals as Ruytim Hins, spoke to the kaheen surrounded by low men
You get kinda annoyed where it's like, the mystery of the entirely of book 5 existed just as a vague non-answer here. Children are stolen, return retarded. Why?Their mental life force helps the Breakers . Ok, but how? Did the they need it? Did the actions of book 5 affect how things are now? Why this one specific town? Why not just grab random kids across the country as needed? Why not breed your own little human farm closeby in captivity?
And I'm really getting my almonds activated about the fourth wall breaking. When describing the books to my wife, I mentioned how the magic balls and little turtle thing were basically a deus ex machina. They exist so King can have them do whatever is needed for the plot to continue. Then later in the books, the characters think to themselves if Stephen King used a deus ex machina in the form of the turtle. It was so goddamn obvious to even an idiot like me, but Stephen King still painfully spelled out "yeah the turtle exists in case I write myself into a corner, i just have the turtle magically fix everything" RIGHT INTO THE GODDAMN BOOK
I don't understand how he's such an acclaimed author. Everything is too long, too weird, too much pedophilia. He creates interesting worlds but you really have to skim through it and fill in the gaps yourself
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I felt the same way after reading “IT”.
Stephen King is good at world-building, he has a creative imagination and the first chapters of IT were page turners. But then there's so much pointless filler, too many long-butt descriptions of mundane settings, too many characters backgrounds and flashbacks where he tells the reader their whole biographies and it just goes nowhere.
I feel like that book would be much better if it was trimmed by 300-400 pages. I won't even comment on his unnecessary and unasked child orgy. Does the Dark Tower includes libertarian moments as well? I wasn't a fan of the gian turtle either, that was just trying to be weird for the sake of it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He really loves backstories. The entirety of book 4 and most of book 5 was backstory. I'm now learning all about a character we just met and how he tried getting into the army and none of it matters because we already established literally anything can happen in this universe, so we don't need 100 pages of justification for why this person can do this thing
Offhand comment about how, given the opportunity, the succubus would've r*ped the 12 year old
Informing the reader that the newborn has a giant, quivering, erect peepee
And while it's not actually sexual, i kekked a little that there's a point in the story where an old priest and young boy enter a hotel room together.
Edit: the young boy gets a hug from a preteen girl. King informs us that he can feel her small, hard breasts against his chest
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
His obsession to detail needless backstories, his deux-ex machinas and weak endings are the reason why I don't consider him a good writer. He'a a good and creative storyteller, that's why he's popular but darn, he really needs an editor.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jake had barely noticed; his thoughts had turned in another direction. "I wonder if Stephen King ever uses dreams in his writing. You know, as yeast to make the plot rise."
Jesus Christ. This is so far beyond breaking the fourth wall. This is outright admitting -- again -- that he's a hack and will take the laziest tropes to finish a story
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Wow, you must be a JP fan.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Dungeon Crawler Carl
It's fun. One of the main characters is a marsey
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Finishing the morning star by karl ove knausguard
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The ultimate evil behind sexuality is the human female. They are the main instigators of s*x. They control which men get it and which men don't. Women are flawed creatures, and my mistreatment at their hands has made me realize this sad truth. There is something very twisted and wrong with the way their brains are wired. They think like beasts, and in truth, they are beasts. Women are incapable of having morals or thinking rationally. They are completely controlled by their depraved emotions and vile sexual impulses. Because of this, the men who do get to experience the pleasures of s*x and the privilege of breeding are the men who women are sexually attracted to... the stupid, degenerate, obnoxious men. I have observed this all my life. The most beautiful of women choose to mate with the most brutal of men, instead of magnificent gentlemen like myself.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context