Weekly “what are you reading” Thread #53 :marseyreading:

To discuss your weekly readings or books, textbooks and papers.

!bookworms !classics

I finished “The Lady with the Little Dog” by Chekhov yesterday, there's only one more short story on the compilation book I have, “The Bishop”. Next I want to start “Père Goriot” by Balzac as I downloaded the epub on my kindle like 3 years ago but never read it.

21
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Finished Master and Margarita now reading Paradise Lost

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thoughts on Woland and Margarita?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't like Margarita because she cheated on her Husband who never did anything bad to her and in fact loved her (Also dislike Master for the same reason), Woland is funny and I like him, pretty cool interpretation of the Devil

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I read American Pastoral. It's mostly about a family dealing with their daughter going full radical activist mode during Vietnam. Its narrative style has some things in common with the Updike Rabbit books, with regard to frequently focusing on the minutiae of American family life at specific periods of time rather than rapidly advancing the story's plot, but its subject matter is more serious. I think it's an interesting take on intergenerational conflict.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

modern man in search of soul by Carl Jung. Only Jung I've read and am clearly too r-slurred to get much out of it. He makes references to a lot of other literature that I haven't read so I have no idea what it is referring to except when he references the Bible or the rare thing I have read. Other than that it was pretty interesting and appropriate for the time we have been born into.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What works for me in these situations is reading :marseynerdy: slower than usual and stopping periodically to see if I understood what I just read. It's counter to my usual style but necessary for these sorts of topics.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Missed the thread yesterday, but I finished The Once and Future King. The second half takes a much more serious turn, to the point where they don't feel like the same book.

I think this might actually qualify as magic realism. Supernatural elements are out of focus and presented very matter-of-fact-ly. They're a big part of the "plot," but the text is much more interested in the people living in this world. Stuff that another author might have spent five chapters on (wars, epic quests, finding the Holy Grail) gets summarized in a few paragraphs or related in dialog so we can get back to cuckold drama or discussions of governing philosophy. The book is extremely well written, but also sometimes frustrating for this reason. And it makes me want to read some older Arthurian tales.

I'd say the book is often mischaracterized as fantasy because the first section has a lot more focus on direct encounters with magic (Arthur getting turned into different animals, etc)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm still reading Humans: From the Beginning. It's finally starting to get good, and discussing the emergence of Homo sapien. I also just read through the technical appendix which includes details about, among other things, how isotope analysis is used in paleoarchaeology.

One interesting tidbit is that there are two stable isotopes of Carbon, 12C and 13C. Plants absorb both from the atmosphere so any animal eating them will have a mixture. However, different plants have slightly different methods of photosynthesis which favors one over the other. The book describes C3 and C4, where most plants are C3 (including trees, shrubs, etc.), whereas the rarer C4 process is used in grasses (and a few other minor plants). By analyzing the ratio of 12C to 13C in an animal, you can therefore determine whether it ate primarily C3 plants, primarily C4 plants, or a mixture. (If that animals eats meat, you'd determine whether the meat comes from C3 or C4 herbivores - it grazing animals which eat primarily grasses vs browsing animals which eat primarily leaves).

I just thought that was really neat.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Biographies on Hitler, Mao, Ho Chi Minh, Stalin, Franco, Eldridge Cleaver, and Nixon

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

West by West by Jerry West and Jonathan Coleman

Excerpt

When I would wake early in the mornings and didn't have to trudge off to school, where I was an indifferent student, I couldn't wait to climb the steep Alleghenies (part of the Appalachian range) and hike around the woods like an explorer, some sort of modern-day Daniel Boone (who spent a lot of time in West Virginia) or Davy Crockett. With my Daisy Red Ryder BB gun in hand, then later a Remington .410 single-shot shotgun, I loved the fact that I had no idea what the heck I was going to see (though secretly I was both excited and terrified by the idea of running into a bear). I wanted to go places where no one else would be, or even think to venture. To me, the woods held the possibility of finding a magic elixir, a perfect-world Magic Kingdom where every animal I ever wanted to see—or have an opportunity to shoot—would be; they'd be there but hiding, watching me, as I would be on the lookout for them: squirrels, rabbits, and, if I was lucky, ruffed grouse. It became a competition, one of the first of many in my life, and in retrospect, I viewed it as one way to climb up from the abyss.

I had a sense of wonderment, a tingling feeling that would wash over me when I found spots high up where I could get a vast overview of what lay below (a feeling that has endured all these years, be it on a golf course at the top of a ridge or in an upper-level suite at an arena or from the window of an airplane). If I could have afforded binoculars or a telescope at the time, it would have been even better. The way I see it, we all have a different idea of what's beautiful, what's attractive to look at, what captures the eye. I am, more than anything else, a visual person. I love vibrant colors (if you ever saw my collection of patterned Missoni sweaters, which I take a lot of kidding about, you would see why). And I love to observe people practice their crafts.

Every August I could hardly wait to go to the State Fair, near Lewisburg, or the Kanawha County Fair, in Charleston. But instead of marveling at the largest cucumber or the largest tomato (though I have put in and tended a number of gardens in my life and can talk about the finer points of heirloom tomatoes with anyone), I most enjoyed watching the amateur sketch artists, trying to figure out how they could draw a person so quickly and make him or her so lifelike. That fascinated me, in part because I couldn't. And yet I wanted to know more. That's how I have always been. If I don't know something, I will strive to find out about it, and I will often drive everyone around me—including myself—crazy in the process. In this case, I wanted to know, to figure out, which of these people might go on to become professional artists and make a real living and perhaps paint masterpieces and which would not, maybe in part because they were merely content and comfortable to do what they were doing. What I came to realize, to sense even then, is that it is one thing to have a vague vision and quite another to be able to bring that vision into sharp focus and have the drive and will to go beyond it. So much depends on finding out what's inside a person that, eventually, will enable him to achieve on a larger scale.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyglancing:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.