!bookworms !kino ASOIAFcels among you
In my book, Aegon and Helaena have three children, not two. The twins, Jaehaerys and Jaehaera, are six years old. They have a younger brother, Maelor, who is two. When Blood and Cheese break in on Helaena and the kids, they tell her they are debt collectors come to exact revenge for the death of Prince Lucerys: a son for a son. As Helaena has two sons, however, they demand that she choose which one should die. She resists and offers her own life instead, but the killers insist it has to be a son. If she does not name one, they will kill all three of the children. To save the life of the twins, Helaena names Maelor. But Blood kills the older boy, Jaehaerys, instead, while Cheese tells little Maelor that his mother wanted him dead. (Whether the boy is old enough to understand that is not at all certain).
First he criticizes the Blood & Cheese scene and the lack of Maelor.
When Ryan Condal first told me what he meant to do, ages ago (back in 2022, might be) I argued against it, for all these reasons. I did not argue long, or with much heat, however. The change weakened the sequence, I felt, but only a bit. And Ryan had what seemed to be practical reasons for it; they did not want to deal with casting another child, especially a two-year old toddler. Kids that young will inevitably slow down production, and there would be budget implications. Budget was already an issue on HOUSE OF THE DRAGON, it made sense to save money wherever we could. Moreover, Ryan assured me that we were not losing Prince Maelor, simply postponing him. Queen Helaena could still give birth to him in season three, presumably after getting with child late in season two. That made sense to me, so I withdrew my objections and acquiesced to the change.
Lmao, they're not gonna include him
Most of you know about the Butterfly Effect, I assume.
Yes, there was a movie with that title a few years back. It's a familiar concept in chaos theory as well. But most science fiction fans were first exposed to the idea in Ray Bradbury's classic time travel story, "A Sound of Thunder," wherein a time traveler from the present panics and crushes a butterfly while hunting a T-Rex. When he returns to his own time, he discovers that the world has changed in huge and frightening ways. One dead butterfly has rewritten history. The lesson being that change begets change, and even small and seemingly insignificant alterations to a timeline — or a story — can have a profound effect on all that follows.
More over
The butterflies are not done with us yet, however. In the book, when word of Prince Maelor's death and the grisly manner of his passing (pp. 505) reaches the Red Keep, that proves to be the thing that drives Queen Helaena to suicide. She could barely stand to look at Maelor, knowing that she chose him to die in the "Sophie's Choice" scene… and now he is dead in truth, her words having come true. The grief and guilt are too much for her to bear.
In Ryan's outline for season 3, Helaena still kills herself… for no particular reason. There is no fresh horror, no triggering event to overwhelm the fragile young queen.
LMAO, it's even more over on season 3, the Fat Man is calling out the showrunners like he never did on GOT.
And there are larger and more toxic butterflies to come, if HOUSE OF THE DRAGON goes ahead with some of the changes being contemplated for seasons 3 and 4…
https://old.reddit.com/r/asoiaf/comments/1f8vinp/grrms_new_blog_post_on_house_of_the_dragon/
Also, no sight of "The Winds of Winter", but that's expected.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!bookworms
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
neighbor just admit you ran out of ideas. It's ok
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Meanwhile Tolkien wrote LOTR during WW2
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Meanwhile wizard mommy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
!neolibs support Mommala Harris so can finish TWOW!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yasss kween.
OH NO.
!neolibs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I often wonder about this: do chuds really want economic leftism with rightoid trappings like stupidpol types suggest? Or do they just hate economic leftism inherently?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If Trump translated Capital into Trumpese and made that his platform, they'd be perfectly happy so long as he opposed $current_thing. If Trump was possessed by Ayn Rand, they'd be equally happy for Atlas to shrug off the current thing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Rural chuds want more money for social security, more money for Medicare, more money for farm subsidies, interest rate cuts, global tariff increases, and tax increases on the elites (anyone making more money than them). The only thing separating them from leftoid commies is opposing Trans Lives Matter
There is no party or constituency supporting economic conservatism in 2024
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And thats a good thing!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Dude needs to just log off and write lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context