Snappybeep/boop
Join !friendsofsnappy
10mo ago#5677132
spent 0 currency on pings
It looks like the explanation is right there in the thread. The comic is a parody of stereotypical “coming out” scenarios represented in media. It psychologically primes people for the acceptance of such behaviors (both in the real world sense–that of being gay–and in the contextual sense–that of being a demon designed solely to kill everyone). Indeed, I'm curious why you're not “outraged” about the comic itself equating gays to murderous traitors. Instead you're upset about someone CALLING OUT this comic for its psychological propaganda. Indeed, not even that. You're upset about the no-no word he used in doing so!
Are your feelings hurt by seeing a no-no word? What exactly is your problem with the post itself? List, specifically, what your problem is with the post. Is it really just the no-no word? Why should anyone care about your feelings when you're defending the institutional r*pe of children and the social spread of incurable diseases?
Why are you incapable of defending your ideological beliefs using objective scientific data? Not just in the contextual sense, but in the broader sense of why you seem to want to censor people for saying truth when it hurts your feelings.
Moemorphism (Japanese: 萌え擬人化, Hepburn: moe gijinka) is a form of anthropomorphism in anime and manga where moe (approx. "cute") qualities are given to non-human beings such as animals, plants, objects, concepts, or phenomena.
Tag NSFW appropriately, credit where credit's due and try to append all posts with "-chan", such as "Ruqqus-chan".
Sidebar picture by the excellent AsininePorcupine from ye olde Ruqqus and banner by Prawny (non-copyrighted).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It looks like the explanation is right there in the thread. The comic is a parody of stereotypical “coming out” scenarios represented in media. It psychologically primes people for the acceptance of such behaviors (both in the real world sense–that of being gay–and in the contextual sense–that of being a demon designed solely to kill everyone). Indeed, I'm curious why you're not “outraged” about the comic itself equating gays to murderous traitors. Instead you're upset about someone CALLING OUT this comic for its psychological propaganda. Indeed, not even that. You're upset about the no-no word he used in doing so!
Are your feelings hurt by seeing a no-no word? What exactly is your problem with the post itself? List, specifically, what your problem is with the post. Is it really just the no-no word? Why should anyone care about your feelings when you're defending the institutional r*pe of children and the social spread of incurable diseases?
Why are you incapable of defending your ideological beliefs using objective scientific data? Not just in the contextual sense, but in the broader sense of why you seem to want to censor people for saying truth when it hurts your feelings.
Snapshots:
https://x.com/parirobo/status/1742455757893710314:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context