/h/music House Femboy Founder
TheOverSeether VAX/MAXXED :marseycrusader: :marseycrusader: :marseysalad: :!marseycrusader: :!marseycrusader:  1yr ago (youtube.com) 69 thread views #177984

:awoodance: Fun techno song I found, by a literally who group. :ricardodance:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=NcXCkz9IrvA

ODYSSAY - Castle in the Sky

Hits around 1:30 :marseycocaine:, and the last 30 seconds give me goosebumps!

:marseyexcited: :marseyexcitedyellow: :marseyexcitedgreen: :marseyexcitedorange: :marseyexcitedred: :marseyexcited:

https://youtube.com/channel/UCF9-M32untn29Mjri_2-npg

Only has 233 subscribers and 5 songs!

12
New Old Top Bottom Controversial Random
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

View entire discussion

Youtube is great for obscure songs.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah, their algorithm is pretty darn good. It's wild because I clear all cookies, have anti-tracking, and block ad domains on my router, but YT still keeps track of my history. I guess they track by IP.

Oscillian is another one I found.

They've got an album loosely based on The Thing. Pretty fun stuff! :marseypixel:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

they do tracking by IP (like Google Maps tries to show you your town), but are you aware of "super cookies" as well?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is that the canvas shit? I've got firefox blocking all that crap, and it clears everything upon close.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

canvas shit

That and other things. In the beginning it was mostly flash, but now it can also be your ISP injecting a unique ID. Only way around is VPN. If you want to log-in on a site then you HAVE to pay for one! TorBrowser works for anon look ups only.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's interesting. I host my own DNS (relay or cache), so my ISP can only facilitate routes instead of logging and tampering with DNS requests.

This 8-year-old stackexchange thread suggests that the ISP assigns a unique header but probably through DNS queries to its DNS. TechTarget says they inject these "supercookies," or unique headers, only into HTTP traffic. Since I'm running my own DNS and pretty much everything is HTTPS, I don't think I should be concerned.

But it is interesting. What do you think?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

only into HTTP traffic

I should have known this :marseypaperbag:

host my own DNS (relay or cache), so my ISP can only facilitate routes

as long as you know proof positive where your DNS server goes to to look up stuff... but then I'm no expert. For example, I found this new feature in Firefox changelog: 'Turn off secure DNS "when a network tells Firefox it shouldn't use secure DNS" ' source

WTF does that mean, a "network" tells Firefox?! Of course we want option "won't fall back if issues are encountered. Warning is displayed" instead! Can we be sure Firefox doesn't come with a built in list of "trusted" fall backs? Hopefully the "Off" setting will be honored at least.

And then there's the whole IPv6 issue and the discussion about "does enabling privacy extensions even do anything?" Have fun with that one.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

spotify only recommends me songs with over 10 million listens

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Maybe it's because you have bad tastes?

:#george: Mmmmm, tasty Soren!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.