THE IRS STANDS WITH HARRIS - Erm this is heckin malinformation, but the title is accurate

Yes, there is. That's why what you said was wrong.

No, whether a union can speak for the IRS itself is independent from whether the union's official stances reflect just leadership or members, too.

I care about that because I am also in a union, a union full of blue collar middle aged men with predictable political preferences, and our union management also endorses the most pro-union candidate it can find every election cycle when the majority of its members undoubtedly vote red. Management and members are not the same.

So it's confirmed that you're injecting your pet grievance with union governance into a topic here that has nothing to do with it.

Literally the only reason I mentioned the members is because people in that subreddit are willfully conflating staffing the IRS with speaking for the IRS because it makes the endorsement post sound more official. Again, this has nothing to do with how the union determines its endorsements and other official stances. The endorsement could be for Trump, and it wouldn't change anything I argued.

I'm done with this tread because I'm tired of fellating you on your pet union topic that has nothing to do with my original point. I don't care that you're annoyed with how your union endorses; it's irrelevant to my point.