molchwho/whom
Dipshitmaxxing
1yr ago#5199940
Edited 1yr ago
spent 0 currency on pings
Anyone who sides with anything presented online in 2016+7 is objectively r-slurred. It's like public discourse is stuck on a 2nd grade level both intelectually and emotionally.
>the joos lied about something, see? see?
>girls are better than boys!!!
>no that's a bad word you can't say that
>we're the good guys because our enemies are evil
People have and will die face down in the mud for this
It's not just an issue that the juice lies, it's much more an issue that they lie so much and in such a fashion that it has developed a unique identity. If your lying becomes so distinct you need a completely new word to describe it, maybe that should be a sign to reevaluate things.
Other than that, yeah, agree. A lot of discussions today are one-dimensional my side v your side, without any examination for why their argumentation is appropriate.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Anyone who sides with anything presented online in 2016+7 is objectively r-slurred. It's like public discourse is stuck on a 2nd grade level both intelectually and emotionally.
People have and will die face down in the mud for this
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's not just an issue that the juice lies, it's much more an issue that they lie so much and in such a fashion that it has developed a unique identity. If your lying becomes so distinct you need a completely new word to describe it, maybe that should be a sign to reevaluate things.
Other than that, yeah, agree. A lot of discussions today are one-dimensional my side v your side, without any examination for why their argumentation is appropriate.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context