Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Anyone who sides with anything presented online in 2016+7 is objectively r-slurred. It's like public discourse is stuck on a 2nd grade level both intelectually and emotionally.

>the joos lied about something, see? see?

>girls are better than boys!!!

>no that's a bad word you can't say that

>we're the good guys because our enemies are evil

People have and will die face down in the mud for this

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's not just an issue that the juice lies, it's much more an issue that they lie so much and in such a fashion that it has developed a unique identity. If your lying becomes so distinct you need a completely new word to describe it, maybe that should be a sign to reevaluate things.

Other than that, yeah, agree. A lot of discussions today are one-dimensional my side v your side, without any examination for why their argumentation is appropriate.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.