https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1847006929790685652
Drone Footage showing the Leader of Hamas, Yahya Sinwar armed with a Stick and hiding behind several Chairs on the Second Floor of a Building, right before his Elimination. pic.twitter.com/a3tOcfFXWV
— OSINTdefender (@sentdefender) October 17, 2024
BONUS: Sinwar EDC compilation
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Disregarding
for a moment, isn't this a horribly depressing video? It's like a vision of the coming WW3. !grillers in 5 years it could be YOU hiding behind a chair in a bombed-out building from a drone piloted by some bloodthirsty zoomer 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Only thing different from the Ukraine vids is that it's inside a building and not out in the open. And it seems to be of a surveillance drone and not a suicide one.
Apart from that, I will be a refugee in a country and will not being stuck behind some chairs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Not Bussin'
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's incredibly straggy to hide behind drones
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Israel protects it's soldiers like gold and silver and diamonds
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I'd be more worried about nuclear strikes in WW3 tbh. At the very least I don't think it would be prolonged enough to have drones hunting around destroyed apartment blocks for survivors. WW3 feels like it would be an incredibly front loaded affair compared to anything else before it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
that depends on how ww3 happens and for why. I feel like nukes will almosy always be a last resort bc the fallout especially in high quantities creates a lose lose situation. Even if the fallouts effext on the enviroment is isolated from your own country, who wants to conquer/occupy land irradiated land especially when much of the resources would be destroyed?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
As far as the USA is concerned nukes are a much likelier threat than drone attacks. I could see it being a thing in say Europe or Asia. My original point though was that weaponry and warfare has advanced so much since WW2 that even with non-nuclear arms Great Powers have the capacity to severely damage each other very quickly. The only frames of reference we have for war in recent memory have been incredibly restrained affairs. WW3 would not be anything like that.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's the loser that will fire nukes first. They would have nothing to lose.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
can we adopt this as a solution for juclear deterence?
!slots100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
It would be both. We would nuke each other but there would be pockets of survivors who had drones. And they would learn how to fight each other in the rubble of the destroyed world. And the war would keep going for years. That's how human ingenuity works. People get really smart as soon as it's about killing each other.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Ha! They have been very clear
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Frick that, I'm the drone pilot baby.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context