Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He says that, in the 20th century, our biggest contributions came from specialists, but now in the Information Age, these contributions are coming from generalists (wrong). I know his point is that the generalist is “better”, but he could just look at humanity’s greatest thinkers from antiquity up to the 20th century and see that they’re all polymaths. That type of genius cannot exist in [insert year] because of public education watering down learning to the lowest common denominator. So instead, you have a bunch of r-slurs graduating with bachelor degrees that can only be trusted in doing one very specialized thing (so they can’t frick it up).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A polymath is a generalist, they're just a specialist in a large number of fields.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A polymath is a maxxed out generalist specialist.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.