Binance exchange has been found to be PUMPING its books too with crypto it doesn't seem to actually own.

https://x.com/DesoGames/status/1591736159386103812

Block explorer screenshot for nerds.

https://x.com/DesoGames/status/1591757789160157184

22
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's the only one you need? I didn't list any other coins. XMR literally has solved crypto but because there's no pump and dump around it no one shills it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao no it doesn't. Ring signature aonymity isn't quantum resistant. So when govs get quantum computers the block chain will be a convenient list of every criminal transaction. Plus it's probably bad in every other way.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Right just like teleportation 🤣🤣🤣🤣 imagine buying the computer larp not to mention if all they have is a string of numbers they can't do anything with it unless you have the worst opsec in history

In the same way you can guess a password you could try and guess the details of a xmr transaction with quantum tech

Monero gains some resilience to quantum attack through the anonymity of its users as well as the amounts being transacted. Although the Bulletproof protocol used in Monero to achieve this obfuscation of transacted amounts is vulnerable to quantum attack, an attacker would be reliant on luck in order to select a transaction of significant value. Furthermore, due to a recent change in the consensus protocol implemented on Monero where RandomX was introduced, it would also have further resistance to quantum attacks attempting to perform a 51% attack utilizing Grover’s algorithm.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

but the account isn't attached to a name

So its just like every other crypto currency in existence?

quantum computing don't real

Cope

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Now playing: Donkey Kong Country 3 - Submap Shuffle [Restored].mp3

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.