Unable to load image

some kino future tech articles

https://www.analyticsinsight.net/technology-2050-awesome-innovations-in-the-future/

https://www.businessinsider.in/tech/17-ways-technology-will-change-our-lives-by-2050/slidelist/53117738.cms#slideid=53117755

https://www.thepourquoipas.com/post/the-next-big-thing-2050-technologies - most sci fi stuff of all the articles

https://www.analyticsinsight.net/technology-2050-awesome-innovations-in-the-future/

https://viralfeedbee.com/future-technology-2050/

Which technology excites you the most Anon?

I think human head transplants would be dope as shit.

It's about time that the medical field peaked and all diseases become curable.

Bionic eyes should have been here by now.

Self healing concrete is also pretty dope stuff.

I don't want nanobots in my brain though.

Space tourism is alright, but I prefer space colonization more.

Self driving level 5 automation can't come soon enough. Still stuck in 2 makes me sad. Hopefully level 3 by 2030.

If half the world's jobs disappear by 2050 then UBI becomes a necessity.

Digital copy of you sounds really dumb, it's the same issue as cloning, it's not actually you.

The problem with the hyperloop is that the further we get into the future, the fewer people are willing to drive in a share a box with strangers.

Space hotel would be cool.

100% sustainable renewable energy by 2050 let's go.

Mars colony trips by 2030 seem improbably, not because of the tech aspect, because of the colonist training time and effort aspect. You would need thousands of humans in peak mental health. Also imagine finding more than a 100 foids on the planet who can handle a months long space trip.

This shit is so dope. - https://www.businessinsider.com/bionic-arm-from-alternative-limb-project-has-drone-2016-6?IR=T#young-was-at-a-normal-prosthetics-clinic-when-he-saw-an-advertisement-looking-for-an-amputee-interested-in-a-video-game-inspired-prosthetic-1

Smartphones obsolete by 2030, yay or nay?

Not a single super tall building city equivalent plan has worked out so far. The tech to build and successfully run the line does not currently even exist so seriously a building with a population in the 10's of thousands won't happen anytime soon, at least till 2060.

DNA computing is such a weird idea idk how it would even work. That is one of the few ideas that feel truly out there.

Smart dust is new to me. Never knew such a concept even existed until now.

That remaining article is the most sci fi shit I ever read till date so not even gonna comment on it.

So which one of these are you excited for anons?

14
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No in the article.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

oh lol. makes sense the other ones are cool though.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I took a look, the guy is also a complete rslur with regards to all the quantum stuff. Idk enough about the other topics but I'm willing to hazard a guess he is completely wrong.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

some of the stuff in some of the articles I let be added because of rule of cool.

I think we can atleast accept exponential software growth as true and undeniable for the moment, which posits a growth rate of about 2x software power every 2 years. ( I know technically its about transistors but playing fast and loose with definitions here. ) which means by 2050 our technical capabilities should be 32,768 times more than what they are today.

Or at the very least our power levels should be there, how we use it and whether we use it well is a whole other matter.

Here is DLMO's law of exponential growth:

If the theory for a concept and its practical application is sound, then during times of exponential growth the technical challenges to achieve the technological capability are guaranteed to be overcome at some point in time.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think we can atleast accept exponential software growth as true and undeniable for the moment, which posits a growth rate of about 2x software power every 2 years.

This doesn't even make sense without a definition of what exactly is growing. Windows bloat sure is growing exponentially though but that's not a good thing.

If the theory for a concept and its practical application is sound, then during times of exponential growth the technical challenges to achieve the technological capability are guaranteed to be overcome at some point in time.

You might have exponential growth in some aspects but not necessarily all the aspects required to avoid a bottleneck. Further, problems can be exponential or super exponential.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well you generally don't have exponential problems, more like a failure cascade. I consider those two separate categories.

Your storage capacity and device speed and chip ability has kept growing every 2 years or so.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well you generally don't have exponential problems

Neighbour what? A massive amount of problems are exponential. That's the whole reason we want quantum computers, to be able to do some exponential problems.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's exponential math problems though.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseybruh2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.