Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I love it. This will help kill social media

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't think it will kill it, but it might just drive off the last semi-sane people. The terminally online ones will fork out the money while bitching and moaning about it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If only crazy people exist in it then it will die.

My evidence: every right wing social media site goes no where. Right wingers are crazy. Ergo crazy people websites die

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Social media survives by the hordes of normies that keep it in the public eye for advertisers, while crazies and spergs provide the content (for free) that normies consume.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Anything to kill the Zuckerberg empire

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't think it will change anything. Most social media users are harmed in terms of psychological damage and time waste way more than 15 dollars a month's worth.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, it'll help kill anonymous social media as normies are already self doxing.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Imagine tying all of your social media posts to your government ID and PAYING for it

And then imagine the implications of doing this under a government where speech is not protected, at least not in a meaningful way

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

censoring speech is a defining trait of the wingcuck :marseyhorseshoe:


Follower of Christ :marseyandjesus: Tech lover, IT Admin, heckin pupper lover and occasionally troll. I hold back feelings or opinions, right or wrong because I dislike conflict.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseytrollgun:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Literally paying to do the glowfigs job for them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

$12 on web, $15 on iOS

Lmao making applecels pay more for it is an absolute king move.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's funny because they're honest about it and applecels can still pay the lower rate online but a ton will pay the higher rate through iOS for no reason. Sometimes you get some sweet "better scam protection" cope which isn't even true because chargebacks exist.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Probably because iOS takes a cut, so they have to up the amount to get the same cut. Which makes it even better imo, frick off apple and those who enable their BS

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Isn't announcing this publicly against apple store policy? Chad move tbh

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the current value of IG verification is that women will see your message requests when you slide into their DMs. if this is still the case then the $12/month is actually worth it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Who the frick wants to be on meta?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Instagram is still pretty popular

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

All you get with this is the blue check too, not the other features Elon included

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Makes sense for companies, at least that’s what was talked about in the Blind thread.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.