Unable to load image
Reported by:
  • 9 : this is a good thing
  • Thirtythirst4sissies : Transition tou skinny manlets shits you have nothing to loose

:marseytransflag2: Evidence for hiring discrimination in favor of women for software engineering roles :marseywomanmoment!: :marseyblops2cel:

https://old.reddit.com/r/csMajors/comments/11oviuv/evidence_for_hiring_discrimination_in_favor_of

Bonus bolded 41% mention in the post

Lmfao look at OP’s post history. embarrassing asf

https://old.reddit.com/r/csMajors/comments/11oviuv/evidence_for_hiring_discrimination_in_favor_of/jbux7e0/

This is whataboutism and that article only presents anecdotes. [-63]

https://old.reddit.com/r/csMajors/comments/11oviuv/evidence_for_hiring_discrimination_in_favor_of/jbv0j27/

Too many issues with this study and your conclusion.

  • The last names highly imply white or black women, so intersectionality isn’t taken into account
  • Your 41% here is meant to encourage outrage when it’s 11.2% to 15.8%, which while is a slight advantage, isn’t as egregious as you make it seem
  • Almost all of the jobs in this study fall into the category “senior”. It says that job titles aren’t mutually exclusive. You aren’t even competing for those positions as a college grad, so you aren’t losing there.

It even says it in the study itself:

“The results of the field experiment support the hypothesis that female software engineers experience positive discrimination at the screening phase of hiring pro- cesses. This is at least found to be true for applicants with moderately impressive backgrounds and a few years of full-time work experience, and this result could be generalized through follow up research.“

You aren’t getting hired because you can’t even be half-assed to read the conclusion. If you wanna whine about new grad/internships, at least pull a study that actually looks at that experience level.

OP consistently posts on purple pill. That tell me enough about his views on women and why he thinks his failing is directly caused by something like this.

Your 41% here is meant to encourage outrage when it’s 11.2% to 15.8%, which while is a slight advantage, isn’t as egregious as you make it seem

Comparing the difference in percentage points makes no sense when most applications don't receive a callback.

Women get 40% more callbacks so they have way more options at that point than men. If a man and a woman with an otherwise identical resume both send 100 applications, that's 4-5 more callbacks for the woman.

You aren’t getting hired

Do you not see my role? I'm just a freshman, I'm not applying to jobs or internships yet. What's up with the immediate assumptions and personal attacks? [-16]

https://old.reddit.com/r/csMajors/comments/11oviuv/evidence_for_hiring_discrimination_in_favor_of/jbuxk6f/

https://old.reddit.com/r/csMajors/comments/11oviuv/evidence_for_hiring_discrimination_in_favor_of/jbuzpjr/

98
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>the thing that everyone already knew was happening has now been scientifically proven

and that's a good thing! :bigsmilesoyjak:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

it was proven years ago, lol.

Whenever I'd post about it the same thing would happen - swarmed by redditors that suddenly become the most skeptical people on earth when one of their deeply held assumptions are challenged.

It wasn't even sublte that this was happening.

Almost every comment is an ad hominem attacking his post history and ignoring what was actually posted.

"short"

"incel"

"degenerate."

These are the people that consider themselves logical and reasonable lmao.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

what does that have to do with literally anything? he posted a link to a study, which is what’s being discussed. he could spend all his time posting about fricking anal plug reviews. that has nothing to do with the validity or lack thereof of this study.

The excess in logical fallacies are beginning to turn this one redditor crazy!

:marseytrollc#razy:


:marseyfamily: this comment is extra funny because rdrama users are gay and use anal plugs!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Almost every comment is an ad hominem attacking his post history and ignoring what was actually posted.

I honestly thought it was sorted by controversial, but nope, "best" LMAO.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Almost every comment is an ad hominem attacking his post history and ignoring what was actually posted.

:marseygigachad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

all three of those things are true tho

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We haven't reached that point yet. They're still denying it. It's only once the evidence is allowed to become undeniable that they say it's a good thing.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16786564719855914.webp

unironically i hope more foids get bullied out of CS so they don't steal all our jobs :marseygigachad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.giphy.com/media/1Ygjm6ScViz2r0KXGX/giphy.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Imagine punching this thing in the face

:#marseywholesome:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So many :marseyindignant:s in that thread lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

go study some leetcode bro women are not the reason you’re failing

:marseyfedoratip:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

it's nice being a diversity hire ngl

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A big part of this could just be companies wanting people from different walks of life for different perspectives and thus different ideas.

Let's be real: they're either struggling to fill a quota, or they just want someone they can photo for their website.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why not just hire a model for the website photo instead?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If the only diversity hire on your website is a temp no longer on your payroll, you're pretty open to being cancelled. The whole point is to guard against that.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thats the thing though, a twitter mob cant really find out who you have on payroll unless you tell them, so take the photo and dont say anything

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They publish diversity stats in their annual investor reports, gotta hit those ESG targets

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just transition

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't know why they're looking for evidence. Corporations these days openly state that DEI requirements mean that they're moving towards Equity instead of equal opportunities.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The worst str8s are those who do not have a healthy amount of misogyny. Truly straggots.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>every company proudly announces they use positive discrimination/affirmative action, and which groups are favoured... but at the same time I'm gonna need a study to prove it exists, at which point I will nitpick methodology and call you names

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't know how you can look at that thread and then claim that humanities majors are the ones responsible for the spread of wokeshit.

Not only do STEMtards (particularly in tech) spread wokeshit but they don't even understand the concepts they supposedly believe in and promote the most r-slurred versions of the ideology imaginable.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.