Bonus bolded 41% mention in the post
Lmfao look at OP’s post history. embarrassing asf
This is whataboutism and that article only presents anecdotes. [-63]
Too many issues with this study and your conclusion.
- The last names highly imply white or black women, so intersectionality isn’t taken into account
- Your 41% here is meant to encourage outrage when it’s 11.2% to 15.8%, which while is a slight advantage, isn’t as egregious as you make it seem
- Almost all of the jobs in this study fall into the category “senior”. It says that job titles aren’t mutually exclusive. You aren’t even competing for those positions as a college grad, so you aren’t losing there.
It even says it in the study itself:
“The results of the field experiment support the hypothesis that female software engineers experience positive discrimination at the screening phase of hiring pro- cesses. This is at least found to be true for applicants with moderately impressive backgrounds and a few years of full-time work experience, and this result could be generalized through follow up research.“
You aren’t getting hired because you can’t even be half-assed to read the conclusion. If you wanna whine about new grad/internships, at least pull a study that actually looks at that experience level.
OP consistently posts on purple pill. That tell me enough about his views on women and why he thinks his failing is directly caused by something like this.
Your 41% here is meant to encourage outrage when it’s 11.2% to 15.8%, which while is a slight advantage, isn’t as egregious as you make it seem
Comparing the difference in percentage points makes no sense when most applications don't receive a callback.
Women get 40% more callbacks so they have way more options at that point than men. If a man and a woman with an otherwise identical resume both send 100 applications, that's 4-5 more callbacks for the woman.
You aren’t getting hired
Do you not see my role? I'm just a freshman, I'm not applying to jobs or internships yet. What's up with the immediate assumptions and personal attacks? [-16]
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
and that's a good thing!![:bigsmilesoyjak: :bigsmilesoyjak:](/e/bigsmilesoyjak.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
it was proven years ago, lol.
Whenever I'd post about it the same thing would happen - swarmed by redditors that suddenly become the most skeptical people on earth when one of their deeply held assumptions are challenged.
It wasn't even sublte that this was happening.
Almost every comment is an ad hominem attacking his post history and ignoring what was actually posted.
"short"
"incel"
"degenerate."
These are the people that consider themselves logical and reasonable lmao.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The excess in logical fallacies are beginning to turn this one redditor crazy!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I honestly thought it was sorted by controversial, but nope, "best" LMAO.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
https://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-the-indoctrination-is-so-deep-that-educated-people-think-they-re-being-objective-noam-chomsky-80-92-15.jpg
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
all three of those things are true tho
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
We haven't reached that point yet. They're still denying it. It's only once the evidence is allowed to become undeniable that they say it's a good thing.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
unironically i hope more foids get bullied out of CS so they don't steal all our jobs![:marseygigachad: :marseygigachad:](/e/marseygigachad.webp)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Imagine punching this thing in the face
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
So many
s in that thread lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
it's nice being a diversity hire ngl
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Let's be real: they're either struggling to fill a quota, or they just want someone they can photo for their website.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why not just hire a model for the website photo instead?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If the only diversity hire on your website is a temp no longer on your payroll, you're pretty open to being cancelled. The whole point is to guard against that.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Thats the thing though, a twitter mob cant really find out who you have on payroll unless you tell them, so take the photo and dont say anything
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
They publish diversity stats in their annual investor reports, gotta hit those ESG targets
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Just transition
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I don't know why they're looking for evidence. Corporations these days openly state that DEI requirements mean that they're moving towards Equity instead of equal opportunities.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The worst str8s are those who do not have a healthy amount of misogyny. Truly straggots.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snapshots:
undelete.pullpush.io
archive.org
ghostarchive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://old.reddit.com/r/csMajors/comments/11oviuv/evidence_for_hiring_discrimination_in_favor_of/jbux7e0/:
undelete.pullpush.io
archive.org
ghostarchive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://old.reddit.com/r/csMajors/comments/11oviuv/evidence_for_hiring_discrimination_in_favor_of/jbv0j27/:
undelete.pullpush.io
archive.org
ghostarchive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://old.reddit.com/r/csMajors/comments/11oviuv/evidence_for_hiring_discrimination_in_favor_of/jbuxk6f/:
undelete.pullpush.io
archive.org
ghostarchive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://old.reddit.com/r/csMajors/comments/11oviuv/evidence_for_hiring_discrimination_in_favor_of/jbuzpjr/:
undelete.pullpush.io
archive.org
ghostarchive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I don't know how you can look at that thread and then claim that humanities majors are the ones responsible for the spread of wokeshit.
Not only do STEMtards (particularly in tech) spread wokeshit but they don't even understand the concepts they supposedly believe in and promote the most r-slurred versions of the ideology imaginable.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Good job bobby, here's a star
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context