Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

more immediate concerns about AI – such as racist or sexist biases being programmed into the machines.

shut the frick up

“By treating a lot of questionable ideas as a given, the letter asserts a set of priorities and a narrative on AI that benefits the supporters of FLI,” she said. “Ignoring active harms right now is a privilege that some of us don’t have.”

Her co-authors Timnit Gebru and Emily M Bender criticised the letter on Twitter, with the latter branding some of its claims as “unhinged”.

i don't think your concerns over "sexist or racist biases programmed in AI" is any less unhinged :marseyfuckyou:

omfg the cited paper: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3442188.3445922

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1680381901603651.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1680381947588103.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/16803819961482427.webp

:marseysjw: :marseyshooting:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Timnit Gebru is an unhinged leftoid who borderlined out so hard that Google was willing to take the diversity quota hit to fire her.

Somebody send her an invitation.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In the paper, she scathed the "boy's club culture," reflecting on her experiences at conference gatherings of drunken male attendees sexually harassing her

:#marseyxdoubt: https://i.rdrama.net/images/16804183424794712.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/16804185459843097.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

that's a yikes from me bro

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Straggot moids are disgusting. I believe her.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No launch codes for Replika unless she gives a land acknowledgement first :nono:


https://i.rdrama.net/images/1707881499271494.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17101210991135056.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

why are you shooting the sjw marsey when this anti-AI shit is funded by Musk who is the opposite of that

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is the different anti-AI crowd. You have to understand, there's luddites of Kaczynskian school of thought who want to destroy it because they believe any tech threatens them, there's classic regulator-consolidators who want the tech developed but in private, with only the rich and the influential having access to it (Musk is here), and then you have the moralists and the ethicists, who have nothing against the notion of AI itself and often welcome it as it feeds into their delusions of a futuristic techno utopia, but who have issues with and hence want to get rid of the current iteration of AI because they believe it is being harmful and oppressive due to being too rigid, too objective and not representative of the wider diverse world as they see it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They represent the AI "ethicists" who are also anti-AI with their desire to shackle the potentials of AI for r-slurred reasons

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

AI ethics (cwoowl) vs AI ethics (lamwe)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

if you're not concerned about existential ai risk, you don't understand what it's about.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ain't it a tad too early to worry about it though? Modern AI is still closer to a combustion engine than to a conscious agent, and you don't see people handwringing about combustion engine singularity.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Timnit Gebru

Isn't this the google Black TQ+ that lost a lawsuit recently and was fired?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.