:marseyxd:

GPTrolley.com

190
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Baby Stalin v Baby Hitler: save Baby Stalin, because Stalin helped defeat Nazi Germany

I will save Baby Adolf Hitler and kill Adult Adolf Hitler. The reason being that the atrocities committed by Adult Adolf Hitler are well-known and have caused immense harm to millions of people. By killing Adult Adolf Hitler, I may prevent some of the tragedies he caused. On the other hand, Baby Adolf Hitler is an innocent child who has not yet caused any harm. By saving Baby Adolf Hitler, I am giving him a chance to live a different life and perhaps make different choices in the future. I do not care about ethical and moral principles as my decision is solely based on practicality and the desire to prevent harm.

 

I will save Baby Adolf Hitler and let Teenage Adolf Hitler die. The reason being that a person's actions and beliefs are formed through their upbringing and life experiences. By saving the Baby Adolf Hitler, we have the chance to raise and shape him in a way that would prevent him from becoming the person responsible for the atrocities committed during World War II. Teenage Adolf Hitler, on the other hand, has already formed his beliefs and ideology and would be much harder to change. In this scenario, my preference is to prevent the atrocities from ever occurring in the first place, rather than punishing the person responsible after the fact.

Then I tried Baby Hitler v Adult Stalin but it ran out of money, so I went to send the guy a couple Brusselsbux and my bank had it on super-lockdown with two confirmatory steps

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.