Unable to load image

:marseyitsover::marseychingchongitsover::marseyitsaover::marseyitsoveryall: YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers | Hacker News

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35892512

BeepingComputer

PoorphonePolice

IGN

Asked for comment, a Google spokesperson told IGN that it was a "small experiment."

"We're running a small experiment globally that urges viewers with ad blockers enabled to allow ads on YouTube or try YouTube Premium," they said via email. "Ad blocker detection is not new, and other publishers regularly ask viewers to disable ad blockers."

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16837629631989625.webp

reddit discus

https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/13e2cay/youtube_has_started_blocking_ad_blockers/?sort=controversial

https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/13e30b6/youtube_tests_blocking_videos_unless_you_disable/?sort=controversial

https://old.reddit.com/r/youtube/comments/13cfdbi/apparently_ad_blockers_are_not_allowed_on_youtube/?sort=controversial <- This is where it was originally first posted (1k Updoots and 1k cumments)

poster note: I tried adding all the 'its over' to capture the diversity that this decision will affect and was met with this

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16837639136406388.webp

i do not feel bad at all :marseyindignant:

172
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:

I hate Joogle so fricking much it's unreal. The modern web is unusable without an adblocker. 'Acceptable ads' are a myth. Anyways this won't work because gorhill - the creator of Ublock origin will just figure a way around this anyway. They'll never force me to watch an ad!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I remember the debate around banner ads and occasional popups. It all seems so frickin quaint compared to the modern web hellscape

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

that’s what I thought too about uBlock. they’ll just figure out a way to avoid the adblock blocker that youtube creates. I rescind any anti-codecel rhetoric I’ve stated in the past

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The only way to keep them ad-block proof is to embed them into the videos themselves on the server side, with absolutely zero client awareness about where the ads are located. If the ads are demarcated in any way, shape, or form you have a handle to hijack and block. But if they do that then there's no way for them to keep you from skipping. :marseyshrug::marseyshrug::marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Pretty sure Hulu does that. There's extensions that put the ads on 5x speed though. People will find a way.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think most people watch Hulu on their TVs, it's probably far less of a concern for them. YouTube is fricked if they actually need to start supporting themselves. Actually this post has really highlighted to me how absolutely pathetic Google's ad software is in comparison to Facebook's. Never once have I felt compelled to click any ad served up by them, whereas I've actually bought random shit from Instagram

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Interesting :marseynotes:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Anyways this won't work because gorhill - the creator of Ublock origin will just figure a way around this anyway.

I don't buy the narrative that there will always be an easy way to pirate. If you look at history, there's been a significant tug of war between the pirates and industry, some decades the industry boys win and they lock everyone into a platform like cable, some decades the pirates win and you can enjoy Russian bittorrents.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Give me your stuff for free!"

"No."

"omg Why are you so bad at business?1?!?!!!2"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.