Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The birth of the free software movement had nothing to do with things like privacy, customizability, communism or anything like that, these things didn’t become core tenants of the philosophy until later. In the beginning it was all about having the ability to fix your software like you can fix your car and this was what appealed most to me.

Stallman argues for the right to fix it as one of the tenets of free software. Your ability to do so is a different issue.

Shouldn’t the idea that people are free to use whatever software they feel best fits their needs be included in the “free software movemnet” or are you only free to use software that is approved by some committee?

The idea behind free software is that is wrong for Apple to assert proprietary powers over its software, even if a particular user doesn't mind the restrictions. In fact, your choice of software to use is really irrelevant to others when you aren't distributing it to them (except those charitably concerned for you), which is why this person shouldn't have bothered writing the post.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.