Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>personal site

>1984 reference in headline

Yeah, I'm sure this will be a balanced, well informed take.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I can forgive posting rightoid sites when the mainstream press collectively "forget" to report important stories

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Agreed. They're a useful check against the very convenient blind spot of mainstream coverage.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's not a heckin' approved sourcerino though, so don't get any bright ideas about trying to add any of that information to the compendium of ultimate objective truth known as Wikipedia.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jonathan Turley testified before congress and hes actually a really important constitutional lawyer

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So did Alejandra Caraballo and she's a complete r-slur

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!r-slurs what about x

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyindignant:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He seems interesting but he also seems like an extreme Libertarian type, and they're usually the people to take stuff like this to the most extreme. Granted, I'm aware of these "misinformation" shenanigans among the idiotic bureaucracy and I'm not thrilled about any of it, but I also get tired of the hyperbolic takes from people who let their imaginations get the best of them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.