Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They still must be purchased via an often-violent black market

:#marseyracist:

The proper term is deny market

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Unallow market

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

African-American market

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The point of decriminalizing drugs is that the government shouldn't be able to tell people what substances they consume. If that also happens to lead to various things like increased vagrancy and violence, well, we already have fricking laws against all those things.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao, the point of decriminalizing drugs is to stop punishing the vagrant and violent. They always go hand in hand.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's just because the policy happens to be driven by progressivecels rather than by classical liberalchads.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Classical liberalism is now an r-slured take. Only the most stuck in the mud "conservatives" still believe in it.

Get with the program. See Vox Day for an easy intro into what everyone else is moving to

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

See Vox Day for an easy intro into what everyone else is moving to

White Zimbabwe?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't think you can claim a policy is a failure if its implemented in a a dumb way, take the netherlands

They decriminalized owning, selling and using drugs (good policy), but did not decriminalize producing (bad policy), as a result only criminal organizations could produce drugs to sell to stores and in effect they managed to import/create domestic drug cartels where none existed before since legitimate insitutions were not allowed to produce drugs

This isn't a result of the first policy in isolation, but rather result of implementing it in an rslurred manner

Same goes for decriminalizing drug use without enforcing laws already on the books related to theft and violence

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Or Common Good Constitutionalism, which basically believes hermeneutics of judicial originalism won't let us create a Catholic theocracy, so it sucks and its time to replace it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's why I've moved from legalization to benevolent police statism. The perfect system is one where everything is illegal, but the cops only use it as an excuse to stop annoying people.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes but you still need to arrest the vagrants

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The point is that it makes more sense to punish the illegal distributor than the consumer as per some legal theory.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In reality, few drug users are taking advantage of new state-funded rehabilitation programs.

Who could have ever foreseen that drug addicts don't want to quit doing drugs. :marseypikachu2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Every time I read about how "decriminalization of X was a failure" it's because the governmental bodies responsible didn't properly set up the support structures and procedures that were meant to mitigate the problems that arise (or more accurately, already exist but are ignored). If I weren't so ready to lean on incompetence as the most likely reason, I would think it's sabotage.

Something that is totally cool and legit but a city instantly spirals if proper support and mitigation procedures aren't in place. :marseythumbsup:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Drug users aren't seeking treatment now BUT if we gave them cheap and pure drugs they'd definitely seek treatment

Do these idiots hear themselves? Take it from an ex drug addict myself, we won't quit without consequences

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Your contribution has been flagged because it contains hatred, bigotry, buttholery, utter idiocy, misogyny, misandry, transphobia, homophobia, or otherwise disrespectful commentary.

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseywords:

The whole drug debate is so fricking r-slurred, Singapore found the solution half a century ago.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Make drugs legal. Spike 1 out of every 50 bag of heroin with arsenic.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Fentanyl got you covered there

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The issue isnt the guy smoking pot its the guy living in a tent in the park doing fentanyl near kids.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.