Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

putting consumers at risk of alleged harms suffered by the plaintiff, including "chronic tremors, insomnia, headaches, nausea, hypotension with associated blurred vision, dizziness, compulsive overeating, avoidance behavior, and paranoia."

IMHO this kind of grandstanding should be unnecessary. The secret camera should be illegal on its own and there shouldn't be any need to show that the person being filmed suffered grievous bodily harm from being filmed.

It may even weaken the case if the plaintiff appears to be employing some ambulance chasing lawyer tactics to try to strengthen the case.

Not trying to strengthen the case

Trying to strengthen the payout

And to eat more cake

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.