Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The bill not only envisions the possibility of blocking lawful content or limiting access to those over 18, it expressly permits it. Section 9(5) states that if the court determines that an order is needed, it may have the effect of preventing access to “material other than sexually explicit material made available by the organization” or limiting access to anyone, not just young people.

:#gigachadglow:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseypearlclutch2: :marseychildclutch:

Think of the hekkin children!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Im kind of amazed at the conversations I'll have with family member. Often times they are completely ignorant of features to restrict children's access but what puzzles me if when they go out of their way to get around the middling blocks that do exist.

I've seen parents who will lie about their child's ages (10yo) to get an account on groomercord. :marseydespair: :marseygroomer:


Follower of Christ :marseyandjesus: Tech lover, IT Admin, heckin pupper lover and occasionally troll. I hold back feelings or opinions, right or wrong because I dislike conflict.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That should facilitate a visit by CPS imo


:#marseyskinnedwalk:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

canada appears to have taken the lead from "we don't need proof of hate" Ireland in the Speedrun to Tyranny competition, for now

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseysanta:

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.