Reported by:

firefox has officially become straggy and worthless: Users now unable to ignore SSL errors to access webpages.

!codecels look at this cute twink frick horse shit! I the USER can't ignore this error. Firestrag decided that I must be too stupid to understand such things and therefore must not be allowed to ignore this non-fatal error for my own good. https://i.rdrama.net/images/17063799005082405.webp

And frick all on the about page about making this fricking work.

https://superuser.com/questions/826232/how-to-bypass-the-secure-connection-failed-warning-in-firefox-33

And what do you, known bug for 10 fricking years and it's still broken out of the box.

The issue is most likely with the website, and there is nothing you can do to resolve it. You can notify the website's administrator about the problem.

Suck my peepee. You can stop being a ssl strag and LET ME VIEW THE FRICKING CONTENT I CLICKED ON

128
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do you even about:config neighbor?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What would he do with about:config ?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseybrainlettalking#:


Give me your money and I'll annoy people with it :space: https://i.rdrama.net/images/16965516366194396.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I bet chatgpt will explain it better than you r-slurs could have anyways.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

TL:DR there's some random test setting that if set to a large int will cause firefox not to check HSTS.

I just deleted the HSTS database on disk, remade it and made it readonly

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thanks for explaining that. First time I'm hearing about HSTS.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yes but I refuse to have to open a fricking config menu to bypass a worthless error like this

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>put feature behind the tard gatekeep wall to keep the tards from doing it and complaining

>can't get past the tard gatekeep wall

:marseynooticeglow:


Give me your money and I'll annoy people with it :space: https://i.rdrama.net/images/16965516366194396.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's kinda like Microsoft defaulting the windows control panel into their useless settings feature. Tech illiterates have no business fricking with the control panel

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the control :marseyshadow: panel

THERE'S 2 OF THEM :tayaaa:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I CAN I'M JUST TOO LAZY

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyseethe:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:surejan#:


Give me your money and I'll annoy people with it :space: https://i.rdrama.net/images/16965516366194396.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

it very much is a tard gatekeep wall, but the problem with flags is theyre experimental and youll never have the security of knowing if theyll even exist in the next release or not. its absolute fricking dogshit that these things are placed in flags because it makes them unreliable solutions.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That kind of attitude is the reason we still don't have Year of the Linux Desktop

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.