:marseysnappy: The question of whether pedophilia is "wrong" is multifaceted and requires a nuanced answer

https://twitter.com/CBHeresy/status/1761032223820587439
38
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Idk. I'll just throw this out there, they once did a study where they showed randomly sampled men photos of women but lied about the ages. What actual age group do you think the moids found most attractive?

:#marseywoodchipper2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Don't tease, link it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'll see if I can find it .

It def. wasn't that age group, though. That isn't common and has never been, because that's basically against human nature and they think it's a perversion of the normal protective instinct.

Edit:

Found it:

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/147470491301100209

A panel of 150 men (age range = 18–40 years, M = 23.68 years, SD = 3.25 years) rated 24 facial photographs that were randomly selected out of the total sample

For facial attractiveness, young girls received the highest attractiveness ratings (M = 2.12, SD = 0.43), followed by that of adult women (M = 1.91, SD = 0.44)

young girls (n = 50; age range = 11–15 years, M = 13.76 years, SD = 1.44 years), adult women (n = 42; age range = 19–30 years, M = 23.48 years, SD = 2.47 years) and circum-menopausal women (n = 29; age range = 50–65 years, M = 56.83 years, SD = 5.17 years). Participants were recruited from the local population of Göttingen (Germany) and all reported to be native German speakers

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

lmao

Post it on FDS

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's going to be a mountain of sneed

Edit: Who's got a clean account?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

All straggots are p*dos?

:#marseyyikes:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Germany

Isn't the age of consent twelve over there

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Apparently, it's 14 for under 21 and 16 for over 21 partners, but there's a weird age and situation dependent law and it's still:

illegal to engage in sexual activity with a person under 18 "by taking advantage of an exploitative situation"

I guess it boils down to, they can fry you if they want, but they're not required to.

Leafland used to be 12 in the 1800s

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17087593852989974.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

weird that it doesn't include a 16-18 year old group.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wasn't 14 the most popular age?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think that's the consensus. People don't like to do those studies though, even though they provide valuable data on "why men should probably not be teachers"

It's probably a standard distribution that changes by culture, race, and ethnicity

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

15-18

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.