For the uninitiatied: This is the absolute r-slur who spent weeks arguing that "2 + 2 ≠ 4"
https://www.westernjournal.com/wokeness-comes-mathematics-academics-saying-225/
He's also famous for making sophomoric ggplot charts in R to show off his "data science" chops
and going viral for bullshit like this:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Depends on how thin the sides are and their dimensions get smaller. You see? We've already gone into the pointless part of the problem. Try being more practical, like me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
As the box gets smaller so does the thickness of the wall. How many?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
However many that fit inside of each other.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So infinite?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, because in the real world people and machines make the boxes, so at some point they can't make them any smaller than protons. If cost was no issue, then a box couldn't be smaller than an atom or several atoms because it wouldn't even be a box.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's a made up math problem, not the real world.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, it's a mathcel issue where definitions like boxes don't exist. It's irrelevant, like metaphysical debates.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context