Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How do these tards imagine that having a bot write it and then a human go over it meticulously looking for bugs is the right way to go? It probably takes as much time.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because the current method is to have a human write it then have a second human go through their code and the bot is cheaper than the first person.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

well the bot's getting paid $2000 a day right now :marseylaugh:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because people fall for things that start faster. The idea of 90% done to 100% done taking longer than 0% done to 100% done seems silly.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Prob buts if I had a choice between working on 90 to 100 vs 0 to 90 I'm picking the former option.

I use GPT to write templates and then go from there, makes the day easier.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.