Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Sample size of 40 people, all from the same company and same workplace. Whilst results are interesting, I'm not a big fan of that press release making it "new research has found" when it could do with a few dozen study reproductions at larger and more diverse scales followed by a meta-analysis. 40 people is a tiny amount to eke any statistical significance from.

I find it hilarious that whenever redditors (or orange redditors) hate a study or want to sound smart they just say "the sample size is too low" regardless of whatever it actually is

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're right about the false fixation on sample size, but there do seem to be selection problems if it's all from the same company.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Literally every psychology paper uses 1st year psychology students from the author's university

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Alexa, why do we have a reproduction crisis in psychology?"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.