:marseypopcorntime: David Sacks vs Paul Graham slapfight continues. :marseypopcorntime:

https://x.com/DavidSacks/status/1817036245429813683

bonus meymey for those who clicked:

https://x.com/powerbottomdad1/status/1816873861646024937

24
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

TBT Dabblers and Blowhards, even truer today than when it was written.

You can safely replace "painters" in this response with "poets", "composers", "pastry chefs" or "auto mechanics" with no loss of meaning or insight. There's nothing whatsoever distinctive about the analogy to painters, except that Paul Graham likes to paint, and would like to feel that his programming allows him a similar level of self-expression. The reason Graham's essay isn't entitled "Hackers and Pastry Chefs" is not because there is something that unites painters and programmers into a secret brotherhood, but because Paul Graham likes to cultivate the arty aura that comes from working in the visual arts. Having been both a painter and a programmer, I can certainly sympathize with him.

Great paintings, for example, get you laid in a way that great computer programs never do. Even not-so-great paintings - in fact, any slapdash attempt at splashing paint onto a surface - will get you laid more than writing software, especially if you have the slightest hint of being a tortured, brooding soul about you. For evidence of this I would point to my college classmate Henning, who was a Swedish double art/theatre major and on most days could barely walk.

Also remark that in painting, many of the women whose pants you are trying to get into aren't even wearing pants to begin with. Your job as a painter consists of staring at naked women, for as long as you wish, and this day in and day out through the course of a many-decades-long career. Not even rock musicians have been as successful in reducing the process to its fundamental, exhilirating essence.

It's no surprise, then, that a computer programmer would want to bask in some of the peripheral coolness that comes with painting, especially when he has an axe to grind about his own work being 'mere engineering'. Yet while this might be charming or quirky in the abstract, it gets seriously annoying when real facts start getting butchered

...

All of these statements are wrong, or dumb, or both, and yet they are sprinkled through various essays like raisins in a fruitcake, with no further justification, and the reader is expected to enjoy the chewy burst of flavor and move on to the next tidbit.

I am not qualified to call bullshit on Paul Graham when he writes about programming, history, starting a business, or even growing up as a social pariah, but I do know enough about art to see when someone is just making shit up.

...

I blame Eric Raymond and to a lesser extent Dave Winer for bringing this kind of schlock writing onto the Internet. Raymond is the original perpetrator of the "what is a hacker?" essay, in which you quickly begin to understand that a hacker is someone who resembles Eric Raymond. Dave Winer has recently and mercifully moved his essays off to audio, but you can still hear him snorfling cashew nuts and talking at length about what it means to be a blogger[7] . These essays and this writing style are tempting to people outside the subculture at hand because of their engaging personal tone and idiosyncratic, insider's view. But after a while, you begin to notice that all the essays are an elaborate set of mirrors set up to reflect different facets of the author, in a big distributed act of participatory narcissism.

The whole genre reminds me of the the wooly business books one comes across at airports ("Management secrets of Gengis Khan", the "Lexus and the Olive Tree") that milk a bad analogy for two hundred pages to arrive at the conclusion that people just like the author are pretty great.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

team @paulg

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nerd fight! Nerd fight! :#marseyfsjal:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Context?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Paul Graham is a rich dbag who got lucky in the first dot com bubble and mistakenly believed it was because Lisp makes him a genius. He wrote a lot of pompous essays that made nerds horny for money. He started YCombinator that's like a social club for dorks to move to San Francisco, learn to use words like "pivot" and "cap table" and practice sucking each other off.

The other one I haven't heard of, but I'm guessing he's a wannabe Peter Thiel who has opinions about The Cathedral and The Blue Tribe and flatters himself that he's not a right-wing nativist butthole despite speaking at the GOP convention.

:#marseynorm:

Basically.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Significantly, YCombinator is behind :marseynotes2: Reddit, so really :marseythinkorino2: we are all children :marseychildclutch: of Graham :marseyburnedman:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Most of the default subs are run by bots and shills.

Social media is the Matrix. Look into the ties between big tech and DARPA. The content is curated and contextualized to create a certain response in the public mind. Look up the original definition of Cybernetics.

You are human livestock and the internet is your digital enclosure. And like all good farmers, they have to make sure the herd gets their vaccines or it could mean disaster for the farm!

It's not individuals who just love vaccines making these gay pro vax memes. Someone is being paid to do it by some shitty organization likely with ties to the Rockefellers and the Vanderbilts or whatever.

Snapshots:

https://x.com/DavidSacks/status/1817036245429813683:

https://x.com/powerbottomdad1/status/1816873861646024937:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.