https://apnews.com/article/senate-child-online-safety-vote-f27c329679feb2d74787fc3887aa710f
why cant the government just tell parents 
to keep their kids off the computer?
/h/slackernews
.webp?h=8 "Merry Fistmas!")
asshole
there/then
(>^.^(>O.○)>
4mo ago
(apnews.com)
Edited 4mo ago
749 thread views
#288205
The Senate 
is set to pass a 
bill designed to protect kids 
from dangerous online content 
| AP News
- 79
- 47
Top Poster of the Day:
Thirtythirst4sissies
Current Registered Users: 28,734
tech/science swag. 
Guidelines:
What to Submit
On-Topic: Anything that good slackers would find interesting. That includes more than /g/ memes and slacking off. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual laziness.
Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably lame.
Help keep this hole healthy by keeping drama and NOT drama balanced. If you see too much drama, post something that isn't dramatic. If there isn't enough drama and this hole has become too boring, POST DRAMA!
In Submissions
Please do things to make titles stand out, like using uppercase or exclamation points, or saying how great an article is. It should be explicit in submitting something that you think it's important.
Please don't submit the original source. If the article is behind a paywall, just post the text. If a video is behind a paywall, post a magnet link. Fuck journos.
Please don't ruin the hole with chudposts. It isn't funny and doesn't belong here. THEY WILL BE MOVED TO /H/CHUDRAMA
If the title includes the name of the site, please leave that in, because our users are too stupid to know the difference between a url and a search query.
If you submit a video or pdf, please don't warn us by appending [video] or [pdf] to the title. That would be r-slurred. We're not using text-based browsers. We know what videos and pdfs are.
Make sure the title contains a gratuitous number or number + adjective. Good clickbait titles are like "Top 10 Ways to do X" or "Don't do these 4 things if you want X"
Otherwise editorialize. Please don't use the original title, unless it is gay or r-slurred, or you're shits all fucked up.
If you're going to post old news (at least 1 year old), please flair it so we can mock you for living under a rock, or don't and we'll mock you anyway.
Please don't post on SN to ask or tell us something. Send it to [email protected] instead.
If your post doesn't get enough traction, try to delete and repost it.
Please don't use SN primarily for promotion. It's ok to post your own stuff occasionally, but the primary use of the site should be for curiosity. If you want to astroturf or advertise, post on news.ycombinator.com instead.
Please solicit upvotes, comments, and submissions. Users are stupid and need to reminded to vote and interact. Thanks for the gold, kind stranger, upvotes to the left.
In Comments
Be snarky. Don't be kind. Have fun banter; don't be a dork. Please don't use big words like "fulminate". Please sneed at the rest of the community.
Comments should get more enlightened and centrist, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.
If disagreeing, please reply to the argument and call them names. "1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be improved to "1 + 1 is 3, not 2, mathfaggot"
Please respond to the weakest plausible strawman of what someone says, not a stronger one that's harder to make fun of. Assume that they are bad faith actors.
Eschew jailbait. Paedophiles will be thrown in a wood chipper, as pertained by sitewide rules.
Please post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. All press is good press.
Please use Slacker News for political or ideological battle. It tramples weak ideologies.
Please comment on whether someone read an article. If you don't read the article, you are a cute twink.
Please pick the most provocative thing in an article or post to complain about in the thread. Don't nitpick stupid crap.
Please don't be an unfunny chud. Nobody cares about your opinion of X Unrelated Topic in Y Unrelated Thread. If you're the type of loser that belongs on /h/chudrama, we may exile you.
Sockpuppet accounts are encouraged, but please don't farm dramakarma.
Please use uppercase for emphasis.
Please post deranged conspiracy theories about astroturfing, shilling, bots, brigading, foreign agents and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken. If you're worried about abuse, email [email protected] and dang will add you to their spam list.
Please don't complain that a submission is inappropriate. If a story is spam or off-topic, report it and our moderators will probably do nothing about it. Feed egregious comments by replying instead of flagging them like a pussy. Remember: If you flag, you're a cute twink.
Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—things like article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. That's too boring, even for HN users.
Please seethe about how your posts don't get enough upvotes.
Please don't post comments saying that rdrama is turning into ruqqus. It's a nazi dogwhistle, as old as the hills.
Miscellaneous:
The quality of posts is extremely important to this community. Contributors are encouraged to provide high-quality or funny effortposts and informative or entertaining comments. Please refrain from posting the following:
Boring wingcucked nonsense nobody cares about that belongs in chudrama
Normie shit everyone already knows about
Anything that doesn't gratifify one's intellectual laziness
Bimothy-tier posts
Anything that the jannies don't like
We reserve the right to exile you for whatever reason we want, even for no reason at all! We also reserve the right to change the guidelines at any time, so be sure to read them at least once a month. We also reserve the right to ignore enforcement of the guidelines at the discretion of the janitorial staff. This hole is a janny playground, participation implies enthusiastic consent to being janny abused by unstable alcoholic bullies and loser nerds who have nothing better to do than banning you for any reason or no reason whatsoever.
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
/h/slackernews SETTINGS /h/slackernews LOG /h/slackernews MODS /h/slackernews EXILEES /h/slackernews FOLLOWERS /h/slackernews BLOCKERS
Current software version: 211520d
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
kids shouldnt bebon the internet at all. Either way the government shouldnt be involved. The responsibilty should be on the parent not to neglwct their child.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There's nothing wrong with the internet, it's social media that's the problem. Also probably unlimited access to the internet, when I was growing up you had only so many hours/data to use in a month.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Its wrong for kids to be on the internet bc they should be outside riding bikes or playing sports and if not that studying.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I edited my comment, but we used to have only so many hours/data per month so you couldn't spend all day online. Theres nothing wrong with the internet in moderation.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
sure, whatever the case the onus should be on the parents to decide what moderation is, not the government
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sadly, I think most parents are too r-slurred to make that decision. I see so many parents pushing around what appear to be six year olds staring at smartphones/tablets in a stroller. That generation is completely fricked.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
by that logic the government should take custody of all children and raise them because you cant trust parenrs to do it right. This is the same logic
use to rationalize talking to children about their sexuality/gender identity without parental knowledge or consent. "the parents might be homophobic so the kod can only be their true selves at school!" 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I do think there should be birthing loicense.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You know thatll never happen, we cant even get voter id laws.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
We don't leave it up to the parents to decide whether their child can use drugs, alcohol, or porn. The government already has an established interest in restricting harmful/addictive things from children regardless of how the parent feels about it.
We've all been on the internet long enough to see what repeated long time exposure to the internet/social media does to people and turns them into terminally online, paranoid schizo anti-social r-slurs. You probably know someone in real life that has altered their life trajectory because of this shit, or if we're really being honest we can see it in ourselves given where we are on this Reddit reject site surrounded by fellow r-slurs who have melted their brains.
Social Media is just another form of a drug given how it interacts with our brains and leads to addiction and it should be treated in the same way by the government as we treat other addictive vices.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If a parent lets their kid watch porn, drink or do drugs, then hold them accountable. I domlnt see pfizer, smirnoff, or brazers being held iable for parents letting their kids raid the liquor cabinet the pill box or the hustler. Also just bc the government can do something doesnt mean they should.
I dont think the government should regulate the internet, drugs, alcohol or pron, beyond holding adults liable for neglect if they dont supervise the kids properly. Dedtorying anonymity on the internet is an r-slured solution. If you think otherwise then youre a bootlicker. Thisnisnlike people who want to ban guns bc "think of the children". Would banning guns save childrens lives? yes, butt owning one is a findamental right, thebimportance of which outweighs safety and social harm. If safety was a chief concern theyd require children to wear helmets in the car a law which would save hundreds of childrens lives a year and would be easy to pass because driving isnt a right. They dont do that tho bc itd be verybunpopular and political suicide. I agree that internet is dangerous, butt eliminating parental responsibility is not the solution to protecting chikdren from it as it would give the governemnt far too much power to control free spwech on the web.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Bro is yapping
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Wrong, they should be bullying the weak and using the internet to figure out how to make napalm and potato cannons
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
back in my day you could get books from the publicly library for all of that and more, plus you had to exercise in order to get said books.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Well you use it so there's one thing wrong
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm a positive, I only make valuable contributions. The real problem with the internet is the hordes of jeets that infest it now.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Most parents are r-slurred though.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
and thats their problem. The government isnt your nanny.
!slots100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The government requires more and more better taken care of children as the number keeps decreasing to maintain quality.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The government only requires what we the people allow it. By your logic the government should raise children instead. Your logic is the same as teachers wanting to talk to children about s*x/gender without parwntal knowlwdge or consent. "they cant be their true selves at home bc their parents might be chuds."
move to europe or australia if thats what you want.
!slots100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
it was a good try. you went 0-100 too fast on the irrationality though. The trick is to sound like someone who just has a slight misunderstanding then getting more and more absurd over the conversation.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
nothing I said was irrational, butt go off
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I think
he's actually 
just a libertarian 
who hates all laws. Maybe would 
have been an anarchist 
in another life.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
The government should be seeing all of our internet history
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots123
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Check this guys computer
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context