https://apnews.com/article/senate-child-online-safety-vote-f27c329679feb2d74787fc3887aa710f
why cant the government just tell parents 
to keep their kids off the computer?
/h/slackernews
asshole
there/then
(>^.^(>O.○)>
4mo ago
(apnews.com)
Edited 4mo ago
749 thread views
#288205
The Senate 
is set to pass a 
bill designed to protect kids 
from dangerous online content 
| AP News
- 79
- 47
Top Poster of the Day:
Thirtythirst4sissies
Current Registered Users: 28,734
tech/science swag. 
Guidelines:
What to Submit
On-Topic: Anything that good slackers would find interesting. That includes more than /g/ memes and slacking off. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual laziness.
Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably lame.
Help keep this hole healthy by keeping drama and NOT drama balanced. If you see too much drama, post something that isn't dramatic. If there isn't enough drama and this hole has become too boring, POST DRAMA!
In Submissions
Please do things to make titles stand out, like using uppercase or exclamation points, or saying how great an article is. It should be explicit in submitting something that you think it's important.
Please don't submit the original source. If the article is behind a paywall, just post the text. If a video is behind a paywall, post a magnet link. Fuck journos.
Please don't ruin the hole with chudposts. It isn't funny and doesn't belong here. THEY WILL BE MOVED TO /H/CHUDRAMA
If the title includes the name of the site, please leave that in, because our users are too stupid to know the difference between a url and a search query.
If you submit a video or pdf, please don't warn us by appending [video] or [pdf] to the title. That would be r-slurred. We're not using text-based browsers. We know what videos and pdfs are.
Make sure the title contains a gratuitous number or number + adjective. Good clickbait titles are like "Top 10 Ways to do X" or "Don't do these 4 things if you want X"
Otherwise editorialize. Please don't use the original title, unless it is gay or r-slurred, or you're shits all fucked up.
If you're going to post old news (at least 1 year old), please flair it so we can mock you for living under a rock, or don't and we'll mock you anyway.
Please don't post on SN to ask or tell us something. Send it to [email protected] instead.
If your post doesn't get enough traction, try to delete and repost it.
Please don't use SN primarily for promotion. It's ok to post your own stuff occasionally, but the primary use of the site should be for curiosity. If you want to astroturf or advertise, post on news.ycombinator.com instead.
Please solicit upvotes, comments, and submissions. Users are stupid and need to reminded to vote and interact. Thanks for the gold, kind stranger, upvotes to the left.
In Comments
Be snarky. Don't be kind. Have fun banter; don't be a dork. Please don't use big words like "fulminate". Please sneed at the rest of the community.
Comments should get more enlightened and centrist, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.
If disagreeing, please reply to the argument and call them names. "1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be improved to "1 + 1 is 3, not 2, mathfaggot"
Please respond to the weakest plausible strawman of what someone says, not a stronger one that's harder to make fun of. Assume that they are bad faith actors.
Eschew jailbait. Paedophiles will be thrown in a wood chipper, as pertained by sitewide rules.
Please post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. All press is good press.
Please use Slacker News for political or ideological battle. It tramples weak ideologies.
Please comment on whether someone read an article. If you don't read the article, you are a cute twink.
Please pick the most provocative thing in an article or post to complain about in the thread. Don't nitpick stupid crap.
Please don't be an unfunny chud. Nobody cares about your opinion of X Unrelated Topic in Y Unrelated Thread. If you're the type of loser that belongs on /h/chudrama, we may exile you.
Sockpuppet accounts are encouraged, but please don't farm dramakarma.
Please use uppercase for emphasis.
Please post deranged conspiracy theories about astroturfing, shilling, bots, brigading, foreign agents and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken. If you're worried about abuse, email [email protected] and dang will add you to their spam list.
Please don't complain that a submission is inappropriate. If a story is spam or off-topic, report it and our moderators will probably do nothing about it. Feed egregious comments by replying instead of flagging them like a pussy. Remember: If you flag, you're a cute twink.
Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—things like article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. That's too boring, even for HN users.
Please seethe about how your posts don't get enough upvotes.
Please don't post comments saying that rdrama is turning into ruqqus. It's a nazi dogwhistle, as old as the hills.
Miscellaneous:
The quality of posts is extremely important to this community. Contributors are encouraged to provide high-quality or funny effortposts and informative or entertaining comments. Please refrain from posting the following:
Boring wingcucked nonsense nobody cares about that belongs in chudrama
Normie shit everyone already knows about
Anything that doesn't gratifify one's intellectual laziness
Bimothy-tier posts
Anything that the jannies don't like
We reserve the right to exile you for whatever reason we want, even for no reason at all! We also reserve the right to change the guidelines at any time, so be sure to read them at least once a month. We also reserve the right to ignore enforcement of the guidelines at the discretion of the janitorial staff. This hole is a janny playground, participation implies enthusiastic consent to being janny abused by unstable alcoholic bullies and loser nerds who have nothing better to do than banning you for any reason or no reason whatsoever.
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
/h/slackernews SETTINGS /h/slackernews LOG /h/slackernews MODS /h/slackernews EXILEES /h/slackernews FOLLOWERS /h/slackernews BLOCKERS
Current software version: 211520d
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sure. I bolded the important part though.
If the bill is just "You have to provide a way for parents to setup their children's accounts as "child accounts" which come with these features" then there's no punishment
if they don't have that flag set on some particular account. It seems like this is more about forcing the social 
media 
companies to make this feature set available (which they currently don't because they fricking 
love addicted 
children).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
its still a dumb bill. Parents should be responsible for their children, not megacorporations. If younlet your kid use social media too much then youre a neglectful parent and we have mechanisms to punish that.
!slots222
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Backtracking quite a ways from "this bill will require all websites to verify your ID to use them" lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Just bc a law doesnt list a specific requirement doesnt mean that it wouldnt result in a requirement to be in compliance with the law. Putting the responsibility on the sites essentially compels them to check IDs. Same way that setting an minimum drinking age and putting the liability on bars if they serve alcohol to minors compels them to check ids even in places where checking ID isnt explicitly required. Being compelled to prove youre not being negligent otherwise face liability, is ipso factor a requirement. Youre doing mental gymnastics.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
As far as I can tell there
is zero requirement in the law for these social 
media 
companies to preemptively determine, on their own, which accounts are and aren't used by minors. Such a thing would 
be practically impossible 
anyways but I don't see it in the law.
To contrast with your r-slurred
example, there 
ARE requirements in state 
laws for establishments selling 
alcohol 
to only sell to patrons at or over the age of 18. You're right 
maybe some states 
don't specifically declare that such verification must be via an ID check 
but the requirement is still there, and is NOT there 
in this law.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
if theyre held liable for a minor using it after the fact then, they will on their own proactively and preemptively prevent themselves sufferring that liability.
how is it still there by your logic?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Is this in the law? You keep acting like it is.
... because it's not legal for them to sell to customers age 17 or younger? god darn you might be more r-slurred
than pizza tbqh
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
yes, the law says they have to do all these specific things for minors and prevent non minors from communicating them. Therefore they have to identify the minors somehow in order to comply. If they say theyre trying to do all that butt cant show they at least tried to identify minors in order to treat them differently then they run afoul of the law.
and so they are required to check id, bc if they dont and a minor gets sold alcohol they have no legal defense. You clearly have no understanding of how laws actually apply irl.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I see nothing in it that requires the company to identify minor
accounts. Care you link to what part of the bill specifies that?
Given that similar
online 
bills don't have any such requirement I doubt 
they'll add it to this one. For example, companies are already banned 
from collecting advertising data on users aged 13 or younger. Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, etc. are all in compliance with this law. Do you need an ID to use any of these websites? No, no you don't. Some of them just added age requirements to make an account - again, as you'll notice, it's largely on the honor system. I'm not aware 
of ANY litigation against, say, Reddit.com for allowing a 12-year-old to make an account. Do you care to link any such legal case?
You're spinning
a bunch of r-slurred 
hypotheticals to get yourself 
worked up over it because you hate laws in general. While calling me a commie 
for some unspecified reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context