More posts on Lemmy:
https://slrpnk.net/post/12014336
https://lemmy.world/post/18236068
https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/15011289
Coping and seething:
As someone who just joined and picked .ml because it seemed generally leftist
What the frick?
https://lemmy.ca/post/26211900/10776598
Communists are being pretty explicitly anti-liberal, and they make that a point pretty often.
And is becomes clear eventually as you see their posts and read their comments that these people aren't misunderstanding liberals, they're pretty aware that both in the meaning of the word and in practice, "liberals" generally want people to be free from shackles and free to do most anything. Typically summarized along the lines of "as long as it doesn't hurt anyone, do what you want".
Communists don't agree with liberalism.
Communists want to demand much more of people and permit much less. They have much more in common with Putin's extant but inflated voterbase than they like to admit. Even with Putin not being a communist. [-17]
https://lemmy.ca/post/26211900/10777162
certified .ml moment
https://lemmy.ca/post/26211900/10767995
What the frick is that guy on about???
https://lemmy.ca/post/26211900/10767680
Who is that douche?
https://lemmy.ca/post/26211900/10772104
Context?
https://lemmy.ca/post/26211900/10767693
Based on the additional screenshots in a comment, it looks like this whole thing was bait to create drama. [-15]
https://lemmy.ca/post/26211900/10769043
So many things I'd have to look up to understand what's going on and why this is supposedly transphobic.
What bothers me more is private discussions being aired publicly.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We've moved past materialism chuds
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They're so close too realizing something important about their constant need too take over internet spaces and banning wrongthink.
And goddarn lmao this is the most current year lib mentality imaginable, complete with the hand-wringing about "trauma" which is used like the radlibs version of original sin. Absolutely frick all too do with communism in any meaningful way. Just a weird cope that presumes people with happy childhoods aren't going too be authoritarian given the chance.
It's really funny that people think Jewish Lives Matter.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Not Original Sin, nowhere in Christian dogma is that seen as an explanation or justification for anything the sinner does. Trauma is just a standard one-size-fits-all scapegoat.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
yeah that triggered me. freudianism is complete pseudoscience and I'm tired of it
1928
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Marx is to economics what Freud is to psychology, so it makes complete sense. They love failed theories that purport to explain everything under the Sun in one holistic package.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
very cuddihy-pilled
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's not pseudoscience because it's not science in the first place. That doesn't mean it's not valuable.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"what's true isn't his, what's his isn't true"
and Freud has always claimed to be scientific
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He hasn't because he wasn't from the anglosphere. Wissenschaft and science aren't the same.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Dies!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
wissenschaft isn't necessarily non-scientific (that's just a term for German science/scholarship/trade and methodologies) and he claimed to be empirical even if he wasn't an anglo positivist. he calls his work scientific in the translations he approved, so what does he claim to be other than scientific?
the whole point is it's hermeneutic manipulation, and he's a symbolist pretending to be empirical. He's at best a popularizer of his predecessors (esp Nietzsche) who threw in idiosyncratic nonsense like the Oedipal complex and childhood s*x stages, whose fame continues because he was wrong yet interesting. and of course the atheist + Jew + sexual taboo kept him countercultural and a sort of epater la bourgeoisie.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wrong.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context