Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The guy that made knowingly giving somebody AIDS legal

Are you talking about state senator Scott Wiener?

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17241902271023474.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I am a good chud sitting in my cuck cage and bot fedpoating like aevann and the advertisers want.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That would be who passed that law. He also made an exception for age of consent as long as it's between a boy and an older man.

:marseynoooticer:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

W-what? :shocked2:

How young are we talking here? :marseyaware:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseysmughips: wouldn't you like to know

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I doubt this is true but it would be funny.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Wiener introduced Senate Bill 145 on January 18, 2019.[76] The bill proposed to remove the requirement to place someone convicted of non-forcible oral or anal s*x with a minor over the age of 14 (provided the convicted is less than 10 years older) on the s*x offender registry, instead leaving this to the judge's discretion, as was the case for vaginal s*x.[77]

Okay I got it mixed up a fair amount, but still.

>He argued that existing law was discriminatory towards LGBT couples where the partners were just above and below the age of legal consent. Wiener received online harassment and death threats from those who claimed the bill protected libertarians.[78] The bill was signed into law by Gavin Newsom in September 2020.[79]

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

existing law was discriminatory towards LGBT couples where the partners were just above and below the age of legal consent

Ah, yes, allowing for a 10 year gap totally solves this problem. :marseywoodchipper2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah that seems reasonable. I mean I would have preferred that they instead upped the punishment for vaginally raping a child but trying to get parity for them is :marseyshrug:

10 years seems absurd though, I don't see why it would ever need to be that long. I get why romeo and juliet laws exist (charging an 18-year-old for fricking a 17-year-old is r-slurred) but surely a 5-year gap would more than cover it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

tbh this doesn't seem unreasonable. All he was pushing for was parity between punishments based on s*x act. I guess he could've also opted to get harsher on the vaginal r*pe rules instead though.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wiener

Wiener

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I want to beat the living shit out of every strag who voted for him. Hes the worst shitlib in our state and thats saying a lot.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes, let the rage flow through you…

What else do you want to do to shitlibs and be as detailed as possible for me :marseynotesglow#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

mandatory fecal transplant.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:mars#eyanorexia:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah like he looks both toned but also incredibly aged and feeble at the same time.

Does he have the AIDs? Is that why he's so invested in legalising giftgiving / bugchasing?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.