AI bro writes whimsical fart-huffing poetry; dozens of twitter r-slurs gobble it up as an innovative breakthrough

https://x.com/BLUECOW009/status/1830066007886487830

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1725242683703738.webp

53
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

holy shit this is awful. he put in the general solution of Schrödinger's eq in position basis instead of just eigenstates(its the quivalent of writing the quadratic formula or e=mc^2), the normalization condition for a wave function written incorrectly (the limit should be as x->infinity not n unless youre in a infinite dimensional space? or its the wrong line and referring to the sum, dumbass) , and a random vector calculus identity (maybe something to do with surface terms and changing derivatives/sign under the integral sign?) it is nerd posturing/nerd stolen valor, and reeks of something he looked up five minutes before copying and pasting all the symbols. which took months. the whole godel part is eye-rollingly naive and smells like it violates the halting problem and it spits out garbage that they think is real deep bro.

the empty set is equivalent to infinity to the unit interval?

some recursion?

russels paradox

for all y, y xor not y?

basic hierarchy of numbers.

!mathematics !physics point and laugh at this poser

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why is nobody calling it out? There's exclusively comments of praise, are all these people that stupid? He just named variables random pretentious shit and wrote some nonsensical math equalities, Jesus wouldn't the programmers of all people be able to tell that this is nonsense? Why are they praising him instead??? :marseyeyelidpulling:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

are all these people that stupid

Yes they're on X

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because they're not programmers, they're ai enthusiasts who are convinced ai is magic so they wave their hands around and say special words aka prompt engineering. The more "obscure" your bs and the more you are seen eating it yourself, the more your idiot followers will engage and pay for your blue check mark. Cargo cult computer science?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>are all these people that stupid?

:marseyagreewarpspeed:

Not even half of these frickers are programmers, some did at best some bootcamp during the coof but most are just paying on fiverr to make yet another AI porn generator site.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I never paid much attention to this "philosophy of math" and "meta-mathematics" circlejerk [only a few r-slurs who can't hack it in real math and want to shift to a comp sci grad degree participate in that] but isn't whatever this guy is saying absolutely resolved by ZFC? !mathematics

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

assuming ZFC and that the notation/symbols mean kinda what they usually mean, all of those statements are false or nonsensical, except the last one which is true.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's what I wrote? That those statements hold true in Naive set, not in ZFC?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

true in naive set theory in the trivial sense that if one contradiction (e.g. russell's) is true then every possible statement is true and also false.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is why I don't wade into this shit.

>If true is false then why not not false be not true?

                               -Famous Logicel

:#marseyschizowave:

I swear all of mfs be like this

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But it's a wave and a particle

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why? Explain please. Naivety in set theory leads to unrestricted comprehension which leads to random set equivalencies (null = infinity = real numbers between 0 &1). A special case of these is the Russell Paradox.

Why do you not think this is the case. I will not go into any proof (mostly because I don't remember any of this shit, just the vague names and paradox solutions).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

can an ai say this? :marseycheckmate:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Anyone who's gone to any stem class knows and hates this kid

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the teenager that reads michio kaka and posts on quora

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

My foid loves Kaku :didntreadlol:

If I'm going to read stemcel ravings, feynman is more my style

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The fact it could make a game in-browser is actually pretty cool. Is it worth switching from ChatGPT to Claude?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Is it worth switching from ChatGPT to Claude?

The cool kids did this months ago.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well Claude just sounds so innovative, how could you not?


Democracy is the art and science of running the circus from the monkey cage.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's much better on pretty much every benchmark. The only thing that kind of sucks is that you can't manipulate frequency or presence penalties in the API, and the message limits can be crippling even though they've gotten better. Otherwise it doesn't spit out AI tropes as often and it does much better in a closed system using a limited knowledge base. The other thing is that it doesn't have the function like ChatGPT where you can have other GPTs get called in one chat, but quite frankly tool use and LangChain can mitigate that. The lack of AI Image generation is something I've seen pretty much only AI grifters and Indians complain about, because a dedicated model like Flux or Midjourney is better imo. The Projects functionality is also useful, where you can group chats by a similar theme and every successive chat can build off the previous ones.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've seen a bunch of tweets from this guy, he's a genuine off-his-meds schizo.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

if aitards could increase their expectations ai might advance faster than it currently is

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Before opening this thread I was expecting it to be talking about the new Paul Graham's essay

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Mr Wolfram Alpha got beat to the punch. Looks like your hypergrabs are old news compared to the method transend with argument....

....

all_concievable_boundaries

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.