Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Didnt read but if its a service like 'get the device for free, no subscription or anything, just pay 10 cents per print' Id consider it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You still buy the printer, the ink, and the paper but you pay per print and you pay more by print if you use the app

!commenters

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No you don't you farding coomer shithead. This is literally the same arrangement that 99% of medium and upwards-sized businesses have with local print suppliers where you lease the printer for a monthly fee, they monitor the print count remotely with integrated software (or call you up and ask you what it reads), then bill you accordingly and send toners when you're running low.

You've clearly never progressed in your career beyond checking out my XL condoms and lube at the local Woolworths if you've never heard of leasing printers before.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

99% of medium and upwards-sized businesses have with local print suppliers where you lease the fricking printer for a fricking monthly fee, they monitor the fricking print count remotely with integrated software (or call you up and ask you what it reads), then bill you accordingly and send toners when you're running low

some companies require closed networks and specifically dont want that. Others have a fricking printer guy that can make the fricking 25 year old laser jet work just aswell and it makes the fricking ink last longer. Many companys dont hire :soyjakanimeglasses: like you and that stat sounds made up

!slots111

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thx BB, Nice Goomble

!slots 111

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao I'm turbo-:soyjakanimeglasses: making low six figures telling dipshits like yourself to turn it off and back on and I only work 24 weeks in a year

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyxdoubt:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!commenters

:marseybootlic#ker2:

>I too am a medium to large sized business

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's because the printers you're talking about cost tens of thousands of dollars and they don't want to dedicate the capital.

No business is renting a cheap sub-$200 printer in that way.

R-slur.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They also come out and repair that actually-repairable printer when it breaks


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17191743323420358.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

HP are fricking fricks

https://media.tenor.com/Jbp_b9UEn2AAAAAx/anakin-skywalker-i-hate-them.webp

!slots100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Counter point- when is the last time you had to print something?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Menards rebate forms :marseygrilling2:


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17191743323420358.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yesterday, and im abput to print a fricking bunch of shit today. I go through at least a fricking ream of paper a fricking week

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmfao people are just so conditioned to subscriptions now

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Subscriptions are both old-school and create better incentives.

They are old-school in the sense that Bell Telephone used to lease basically any equipment that connected to their telephone network. I think Xerox also used to originally only lease their copiers. I think IBM did similar for mainframes for a while, too. Panavision cameras were only available for lease for the longest time (and may still only be?).

It's better incentives because, since the leasing company is on the hook for maintenance and repairs, their incentive is to have fewer breakdowns. The Bell Telephone equipment that they leased was famously durable. If support for a device is discontinued, then they generally need to upgrade existing users. So, there's also incentive to keep hardware in production longer and make it serviceable.

In general, if a device already makes me reliant on a single company for replacement and maintenance parts, I'd rather lease. If I can maintain it with third-party stuff, I'd rather own.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hmm, sounds like a bad deal to me.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.