Unable to load image

Where Did the Serial Killers from the 80s Go? They're Online, and in Plain Sight

https://substack.com/@benedictslaney/p-148558589

								

								

Orange Site discussion (only 11 comments because the article got flagged for referencing the hecking farmerinos)

42
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>So it's more than capable of recognizing that this video should not be there. I asked it about the comments in the video, and it was also aware that they are inappropriate and that these people can use the platform as a meeting ground before forming communities to go on to much worse things. Google sell Gemini as a service to third party developers to moderate their content. It's very fast and cheap to run, and it's more accurate than a human. Speaking as a programmer that has worked on systems like this, I can say for certain that they are not using it because they choose not to, not because there is any technical barrier.

>Advertisers boycotted X/Twitter over the content that it hosts, but ironically that is the only major social media network where I can't find zoosadists sharing content. It seems odd that they will boycott X over their content, but seemingly have no problem supporting platforms which are providing the meeting grounds for sadists, and frequently leave up the animal abuse channels for years at a stretch despite community efforts to report those channels. The only videos that do get banned or shadow banned are the videos that criticize this content. They'll often have their content removed being told that it features abusive content - where the abusive content is the videos from YouTube's own platform that they're citing to show that it's inappropriate.

I've long wondered whether big tech has been dragging its feet on the libertarian question and has been actively complicit in all the content. Considering how rapidly they delete chudposts, how hard is it to delete literal libertarian and zoodsadist content?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The most charitable interpretation is that they're afraid of destroying evidence.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

been actively complicit in all the content

well when you consider that ghislainne maxwell and epstien were either buddies with the big tech people and behind the seens on a lot of that stuff you have to presumr at least some are.

https://nypost.com/2020/07/08/ex-reddit-ceo-ellen-pao-knew-ghislaine-maxwell-allegations/

also maxwell inherrited a media empire from her father

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17225430325674362.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The best way to get people to use your stuff is to get them while they are young. If you ban cp, the kids will move somewhere else to share their nudes with each others. :marseyhomofascist:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Might have something to do with IT work, internet jannying, and gender dysphoria being correlated

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.