Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Magatards in shambles :soyjakmaga:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17269277786722763.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is two schizos who didn't know each other a "conspiracy" tho?

https://media.tenor.com/0DZpbooeCMcAAAAx/correct-technically-correct.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao, the conspiracy is highlighted at the bottom especially for people like you.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17269269551117003.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#debunked:

:#marseysneedgenocide:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We already have a native version

@Bussy-boy is rDrama a reputable website?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is not a reputable website, but we are very diverse.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What is your favorite conspiracy?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That my bussy is full of mayonnaise.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's definitely not mayonnaise you fricking schizo

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How can I be sure? Maybe it's just regular mayonnaise.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17269337075979385.webp

GET DEBUNKED

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

debunkbot, can a person born with xy chromosomes menstruate?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17269270246557302.webp

:#marseytrans2genocide:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wow. Just wow. :marseyrowling: bot

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Generally speaking

Just say they can't you hedging failbot.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Pretty sure yeah, as long as they develop a womb in early fetal development

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

debunkbot, who makes up 13% of the population yet commits 50% of the crime?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17269265770161068.webp

DEBOONKED

:#soysnooseethetalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jesus they might as well call it redditorbot

socio-economic factors

:#soysnoo:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

lets unpack this

:#marseysoylentgrin:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

it's super important

:soysnootalkin#g:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>for example... could

>keep in mind....

>take into account...

I like how none of the deboonking actually includes any hard facts that point out that anything about it is wrong. Its just hand-wringing to diminish the meaning of the statistic and cast doubt on its claims. Which ironically is literally misinformation.

And the fact that there hasnt ever been an actual hard-numbers deboonk that shows other factors explain the disparity besides race, really shows that it doesnt exist.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's doing the same "I'm just asking questions" type bullshit :marseyitsallsotiresome: that actual conspiracy :marseyrightoidschizo: theorists do.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

did u mention it matches victimization studies?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is so tarded. Whatever :marseyjerkoffsmile: you type in, it will treat :marseygreatpumpkin: it like some lunatic :marseytinfoil3: fringe nonsense. My "conspiracy theory" was that the Safeway-Albertson's merger was only possible because of government corruption. The bot went on to argue that actually :marseyakshually: it was completely above board :marseyrdramahistorianschizo: and I just don't understand how complex and tricky these antitrust issues are. It actually :marseynerd3: was pretty :marseyroan: useful because it went through every possible argument :marseystrawman: against my position and they were all r-slurred :marseyretard4: shit I've already heard :marseyjacksparrow: before, so I'm even more confident :marseysmug4: now that I'm right.

It gave my "conspiracy theory" a plausibility rating of 2 on a 1-5 scale. :#marseylaugh:

No wonder :marseyquestion: the NYT loves this much. It's just shilling for whatever :marseyjerkofffrown: the status quo in politics :marseybribe: and corporate :marseycatbert: greed :marseybipocmerchant: is.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Debunkbot, who is responsible the biggest proportion of trans murders?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17269273292260098.webp

:#dukenukemtldr:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lol literally no actual answer, just libshit sociological masturbation

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It looks like the bot has literally no ability to actually use data in its response, so what's even the point. It just asks leading questions and quotes articles.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I said that I heard Donald Trump was a black man in white makeup because of his promiscuity, leaving behind single mothers, his attraction to sub-par white women, and his gaudy taste in interior design.


>I understand that you've encountered some information that might make the idea seem plausible, especially when it's widespread across different media like news reports, social media posts, and Reddit. It's common to come across various theories on the internet, and sometimes they can appeal to our existing beliefs or biases.

Let's address the points you've raised one by one, and I'll try to provide a different perspective that might help clarify things.

First, regarding the characteristics you've mentioned—sexual promiscuity, attraction to certain types of women, having children with more than one partner, and a specific taste in interior design—these traits are not exclusive to any race or group. They can be observed in many individuals from diverse backgrounds, and they don't necessarily indicate a person's race.

As for Donald Trump in particular, there is extensive documentation of his life from childhood to adulthood, including photographs and videos that show him at various stages of life. His genealogy and family background have been public knowledge for a long time. Trump's father, Fred Trump, and his mother, Mary Anne MacLeod Trump, have well-documented Caucasian ancestry.

Think about how many people work closely with someone like a president. This includes staff, security, medical personnel, and other officials who would have to be complicit in maintaining such an elaborate ruse. It would be an unprecedented deception with a near-impossible level of secrecy, and no credible evidence has emerged to substantiate it.

Now, I want to acknowledge that in the online world, photoshop and deepfakes have made it hard to trust images completely. But, if Donald Trump were wearing make-up to dramatically alter his race, the make-up would have to withstand varied lighting, constant media scrutiny, and high-definition television—without ever failing or being detected by expert observers. That level of make-up artistry surpasses what's currently achievable, even by the best professional make-up artists.

Another point to consider is that Trump has been a public figure for decades. Thus he has been subject to the highest levels of scrutiny—not just by opponents but also by regulatory bodies responsible for verifying the backgrounds of candidates running for public office. This would include extensive checks and vetting by multiple organizations and individuals.

Lastly, I would encourage you to critically evaluate your sources. News reports and social media posts vary widely in accuracy and intention. Some outlets or users may push sensational stories without robust evidence as they attract attention and generate engagement. But as responsible consumers of information, it's important to seek out credible sources and fact-check the information.

Reflecting on these points, and considering the practicality and likelihood of such a secret being maintained so perfectly, might help to reassess the belief in this particular conspiracy theory. It's crucial to maintain a healthy skepticism and look for reliable information that withstands scrutiny. Does this perspective give you a different view of the information you've seen?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

rated my 9/11 knowledge as 3/5 plausible, maybe i can get higher score.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is amazing, I literally can not read more than five words of this writing! I'll start to read one of the AI responses and then my brain just turns of from the sheer nothingness in the text. It's like looking at one of these photos

https://preview.redd.it/4qcjp9glyu281.jpg?width=568&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=55cb4c95b7c1e4784c6c3e36288a14296c1e1b11

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.