Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's beyond exhausting to read the explanations from Wayland developers as to why it still sucks. Seems like the bottom line is that they wanted it to be so generic that it doesn't include any capabilities at all and everyone developed incompatible versions of everything. Like screenshots, for example.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

they wanted it to be so generic that it doesn't include any capabilities at all

The biggest issue with FOSS projects is that deadlines and end users satisfaction aren't relevant so the projects either spiral into mega-scope creep trying to account for every single possibility or devolve into exclusively accommodating the whims of the small group of neurodivergents in charge.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.