Hilarious Highlights:
Releasing source code which is meant to be proprietary 2
releasing source code meant for a subscription
Releasing it under a license that may violate GitHub TOS (Potential Reportmaxxing opportunity ?)
Dolby copyrighted code in repo | github issue
Jeet-tier commits :
Orange Site:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41636804
https://boards.4chan.org/g/thread/102535233
https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1fogjjg/winamp_releases_source_code_with_nonfloss_license/
https://old.reddit.com/r/madlads/comments/1fog97h/madlads_are_forking_new_winamp_source_code_even/
The #Winamp Legacy player source code is now open!
— Winamp (@winamp) September 24, 2024
Developers & retro lovers, it’s your chance to shape the iconic player’s future.
Explore, modify, and build on the classic you know and love.
Get the details & access the code here: https://t.co/TX3sOaSbS5 pic.twitter.com/ZvDeKiJ1uO
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lmao !codecels
Remove the code pls saar
REMOVE IT NOW
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the dude doesn't know how git works, eh? lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's most engineers these days. The number of times idiotic motherlovers push secrets but it's ok because they are going to delete them later so they disappear is absurd.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
well u can force push it gone... maybe at least. idk if github keeps track of the last HEADs, or if so, makes them accessable externally. if both of those were true then u couldn't force push them gone.
and jeeez i learned that the 1st yr of using git back as a junior engineer.
this industry is like 95% redundant fluff. basically a total economic tragedy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
What tards. I just revoke them (when I remember)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
DO NOT REDEEM THE CODE
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The best part is it is almost completely impossible to actually remove code from Github
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Is force push not a thing?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It remains on the PR history. You have to delete the entire repo and then republish to get rid of them.
Also obviously doesn't impact forks. GitHub support can force kill commits but you have to either pay them their Jew gold or pay your Jew lawyer to threaten them for that to happen.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Winamp!
Winamp!
Winamp!
It really whips the llamas butt
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Baaaah
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
So basically they want the codecel community to maintain and improve it for free, but without actually giving any rights away. Good luck with that.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Still using winamp3, classic skin
The same installer .exe I downloaded back in high school or whenever
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Kino
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Lmao. I was excited months ago (especially considering the line of shady owners and the very specific wording they used for the upcoming release ) but completely forgot it was coming out. It's even funnier than I thought
It's like what the Aseprite guy did.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Again, foobarchads win by having r-slurred competition
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I like foobar too
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
LGTM
Snapshots:
https://github.com/WinampDesktop/winamp:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Releasing source code which is meant to be proprietary:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
2:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
releasing source code meant for a subscription:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Releasing it under a license that may violate GitHub TOS (Potential Reportmaxxing opportunity ?):
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
lel:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41636804:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://boards.4chan.org/g/thread/102535233:
archived.moe
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1fogjjg/winamp_releases_source_code_with_nonfloss_license/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://old.reddit.com/r/madlads/comments/1fog97h/madlads_are_forking_new_winamp_source_code_even/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
#Winamp:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://t.co/TX3sOaSbS5:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
pic.twitter.com/ZvDeKiJ1uO:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
September 24, 2024:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://lemmy.world/post/20137876?scrollToComments=true:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context