Unable to load image

Mystery creator of Bitcoin identified, new HBO documentary claims

https://www.politico.eu/article/mystery-creator-bitcoin-identified-new-hbo-documentary-satoshi-nakamoto-crypto-currency/

Intriguingly, as the date for the airing of the documentary has drawn near, a number of high-value wallets from the "Satoshi era" have become active for the first time since 2009.

According to Bitcoin Magazine, around 250 bitcoins — worth approximately $15 million at Thursday's bitcoin rate of $60,754 to the dollar — were drained from wallets in the past two weeks. While the coins are not officially linked to wallets used by Satoshi Nakamoto, they have been dormant since the earliest days of Bitcoin, when the cryptocurrency was worth almost nothing. The wallets' creators would certainly have been Satoshi's earliest collaborators.

38
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Never heard of the Q documentary so i googled it

>In the last episode of the series, Hoback shows his final conversation with Ron Watkins, who states on camera, "I've spent the past ... almost ten years, every day, doing this kind of research anonymously. Now I'm doing it publicly, that's the only difference.... It was basically ... three years of intelligence training teaching normies how to do intelligence work. It was basically what I was doing anonymously before, but never as Q". Watkins then corrects himself, saying "Never as Q. I promise. Because I am not Q, and I never was".[3][4][5] Hoback viewed this as an inadvertent admission from Watkins, and concludes from this interview and his other research that Ron Watkins is Q.[2][5]

So the guy saying he isnt Q is the proof that he is Q?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I mean if you watch the documentary it is pretty obvious Ron Watkins and his son are Q or at the very least became Q when Q moved to 8chan. The documentary was further validated when Q tried a comeback and accidentally revealed whoever was running the account was an 8chan admin.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It would make sense that Q is a disgusting sexpat

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sounds like the guy basically had no definitive proof and just picked someone it could likely be, got a non confession out of him, and said case closed

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

REAL Q Patriots know @sirpingsalot was the original Q.

Factcheck: This claim is currently being debunked.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

watch the fricking documentary. you literally just read the Wiki page and act like you've seen it all. Furthermore, there is other evidence from other people who looked into Q's identity that also point towards Watkins.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

nah, if it were any good then hed actually know who it is. Not gonna watch hours of this guy jerking himself off with speculation.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.tenor.com/FOL3V2bPqP0AAAAx/bait-thats-bait.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The documentary? Yeah it seems like it is.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#nottakingthebait:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But you fell for it! You watched the documentary and believed the r-slurs non answer!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

You have to watch it to see lol. He smiles and catches himself while saying that.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Holy shit that's all the proof i need. Darn why did no one say something making it so obvious before?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The documentary makes it very obvious it was him, theres too much evidence.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wow, an incredibly one sided documentary convinced you of something you wanted to believe anyway

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How was it one sided lol, if it was one sided it was on the side of watkins as the docu just follows him and his dad.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah big shocker the guy they made the film to pin it on was found guilty

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

??

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They made a whole documentary to try and prove that the watkins dudes were q anon. Big shocker that documentary entirely designed to make them seem guilty makes it seem like that are guilty. Its the common academic pattern these days of finding the answer you want and working backwards to prove you are correct.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.