TL;DR: Winamp released their code onto GitHub as open source last month. In doing so they got some of the licenses wrong and have been harassed into taking the code down. Now no one can develop on Winamp. Ars Technica journos and users see no problem with this.
You misunderstand the viirality of a GPL flavour. Sure, the LGPL allows you to link your proprietary code with a library. It doesn't allow you to combine it's sources with that of proprietary products.
It also doesn't allow you to include GPL'd code into your monorepo and claim a proprietary (or frankly different) licence. Oh look, a full fat GPLv2:
Modern OSS licensing is fricking gibberish, designed as a way to give the Code of Conduct crew yet another way to exert their dominance over actual contributors and halt all progress without ever writing a line of code. Stack Overflow power users are doing exactly the same shit over there too.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Licensing is janny-coded. I just publish everything on my github as "All rights reserved", to discurage open source devs from using it, while still allowing pirates to use it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
you should use ARR+BIPOC
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context