Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>In the most recent twist of events, a group of people has rallied behind an anonymously redacted document and has started to target Eelco Dolstra, the founder of the entire Nix project. Note that Irene Knapp, the main author of the failed RFC 98, is among the signatories of this document:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1735214786foMX6lqxILCsgw.webp

Ah yes, it all makes sense

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm not sure who to hate here but I'm pretty sure it's the cOmMie-uNitY

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're basically right. The :marseyairquotes: community :marseyairquotes: , which is really just a small cabal of moderators, ousted the creator and main technological driver of NixOS from his own project over social justice issues.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Simultaneously, this group, still upset about the failure of RFC 98, is using the myth of fascism combined with an abusive extension of the paradox of tolerance (originally formulated by Karl Popper with a very different intent) to portray their opponents as bad-faith actors, or even as outright evil. They themselves, of course, do everything they can to appear justified in exercising power with absolutely no accountability, and with a clear sense of their own privileged entitlement to do so.1

every time

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Open source is going to die if they dont adopt a new license. They desperately need an "open but no :!marseytrain:s allowed" license.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This already came to a head some time ago and turned into the Lix fork. https://rdrama.net/h/slackernews/post/283024/nixos-fork-lix-announces-its-first

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.