Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I was planning on reading this tonight but radioparadise.com had a good site so I'm holding this off tomorrow. Let me know if it's good satire like RFC 2324 or RFC 2549

EDIT: It's like three paragraphs, I'm leaving this here so ppl know I'm :marseyspecial:

EDIT 2: thanks for the gold.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why is the IETF website so fricking dated? First time I encountered it I thought I was on some weird guy’s blog.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just the RFC pages? I don’t think the formatting gets in the way if you’re implementing a protocol. It’s more important to have a standard, even if it sucks, and avoid bickering.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've read it and to put it simply: I'm disgusted by some of the text. And especially when it was revealed that the alt-right "drama" website was involved in the research, my suspicions came true. The text is nothing but smelling coming from some pretentious intellectual dark web teenager fan-fiction writer. Unfortunately.

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I need to find IETF mailing list drama, it's gotta exist.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.