I’am familiar with a lot of concepts and have done a small amount of intro level shit, but how would I go about actually learning applicable/hobby level coding without taking classes?
Edit: I have decided to learn assembly
I’am familiar with a lot of concepts and have done a small amount of intro level shit, but how would I go about actually learning applicable/hobby level coding without taking classes?
Edit: I have decided to learn assembly
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Starting a noob off with C++ is demented.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Keep yourself safe pythoncel, your language was built for schoolchildren
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
C++ is just an r-slured language for people who love jerking themselves off like Haskell, just start with C like god intended.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Frick, I'm taking a functional programming course next year. How worried do I need to be?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Just got through a functional programming course were we learnt F#
Probably one of the most disgusting languages I've ever written in
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I just checked, my course mentions Haskell but not F#. Hopefully I've dodged a bullet there then
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Haskell is much more r-slurred. It's """pure""" which means doing anything actually useful is a pain in the butt.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the point of learning haskell isn't really to do anything useful with it, it's to learn all the interesting higher kinded monadic combinator blablas that you can then use in non r-slurred langauges
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
haskell is harder than f# but more interesting. learn it on your own anyway courses are for soulless mayokels
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's a stupid hill to die on but I think F# forward piping makes much more sense than haskells functions composition.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I might do OK at it then, I think I'm decent at that. Though I'm not sure what you mean by
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
wordcel vs shape rotator is jsut about 'r-slurred humanities slime vs chad intelligent coders' there isn anything about methods of thinkings.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Lmao how did I miss this. People like Jordan Peterson are using the -cel suffix. Total cultural victory
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
wrong
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Ah OK, funnily enough I think chess is the only thing which I'd think about as a sequence of moves rather than a selection of board states, though it's possible that if I were more familiar with chess my understanding of it would start to shift. In most cases my thinking is definitely more visual.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
chess has little to do with it beyond 'how smart r u generally'
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
the strict types, bizzare contortions to get around immutability and control flow, and immutable, restricted datatypes suck. the composability, universality, parametric types, and flexibility are great.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
cope. immutability is a feature
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
immutability in general is great but it really gets in the way of practical algorithms
write a non-amortized constant time FIFO queue with only immutable haskell-style lists. it's a pain in the butt! unironically do write one though it's a somewhat difficult exercise.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
i exclusively write in javascript. every line is an assignment, either to a lambda or to a constant.
currently solving https://projecteuler.net/problem=793
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Functional languages... smh.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Oh ok so you’re not a pythoncel. Nevermind
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Gonna have to agree with this. They even start you off with C in college but I've heard that Python is being taught now as a beginner language. I think that's stupid but I'm not a college so wtf do I know.
At least C is very small and I think the easiest way to learn pointers.
Krayon sexually assaulted his sister.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They start them on python because many of those kids struggle with the concept of a file system and CLI and have not touched anything code-adjacent before. They try to get them started with something simple and then later more into languages like C++ to teach data structures.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Maybe it's cuz I'm a boomer but I think learning a high level language like Python is bad because you don't really understand what's going on under the hood. C is so unforgiving that it makes you understand memory management and how values are stored and gives you more of an under the hood experience.
Krayon sexually assaulted his sister.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I agree, but I think that it's fine to start with a high-level language as long as you drop into lower-level ones and then go back up with the knowledge of the underlying systems in the higher level languages.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Keep yourself safe
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Or based.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context