Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Can physicians and patients be confident in non-FDA compliant vendors without the advanced training and technical ability to properly repair and recalibrate life-saving machines? Who could argue that “anyone can do it?” Lawyers.

No where in those papers or discussions are lawyers or hospitals or the FDA themselves saying that the right to repair medical devices shouldn’t be by FDA compliant vendors and servicers. Just that it should include people other than original manufacturers with open system specs.

>Why? Because when things go wrong, when medical devices fail, when patients and their families suffer the consequences, when associated health care costs skyrocket — it seems lawyers see opportunity. And they aim their lightening lances of litigation at the deepest pockets — the original manufacturers.

Yeah she original manufacturers are the only ones who have worked on the machine and it fricks up they are the ones who will be sued? Totally normal and correct.

>It seems the tort bar is creating a problem they can exploit for profit.

Where’s the profit in letting others do work on the machines? Original manufacturers will just void all warranties and have systems in place for them to be able to have proof to tell the court they weren’t the last one to service the machine if someone else touches its hardware or software? They can still be sued but it’ll be much harder to get a payout from them if someone else has changed anything or even recalibrated something that wasn’t them.

>But wait, it gets worse. By allowing third parties without any FDA competence to repair regulated, complicated medical devices, Right-to-Repair also opens the door to breaches in cybersecurity.

Not really? Admin passwords and accounts still exist even without right to repair. It’d be on hospitals to not give those out as it is now.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.