Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why does every new language use the god awful rust syntax? :marseypuke:

There are like sixty c/++ successor languages in the works, at most 3 can succeed, I predict this one fails. Even despite google backing.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why does every new language use the god awful rust syntax?

codecels when they have to learn something new

:soycry::soycry::soycry:

it's no noisier than c++ and postfix types are objectively better

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Mebe. I still hate it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Whats with everyone and rust anyway?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyshrug:

Last time I tried rust it literally couldn't even use local overrides. I couldn't tell it "Use this file here" it had to reach out to the internet and download the file from some random github

inb4: cargo isn't rust!!!!!

It's literally bundled you have to use it so stfu

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Rust is so bloated it's like they wanted c++ to transition into javascript for :!marseytrain:s or something. Downloading Rust for windows is approx. 200 mb. You can't even use it on win32 without also downloading the full blown visual studio compiler environment. So it's basically a proprietary language that relies on Microsoft's memory-unsafe msvcrt libraries for everything lmao.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

LISP s-expressions ftw

but yeah Rust has a bunch of ugly syntax choices, I think you have to be ugly to be a systems language or something.

Haskell or Elixir is much nicer

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why does every new language use the god awful rust syntax? :marseypuke:

They hate us.

D on the other hand has god tier syntax. Compile time function execution too

There are like sixty c/++ successor languages in the works,

Many of them failing to realize that D exists and is better in all ways

I predict this one fails. Even despite google backing.

Unlike D which is backed by digital mars

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh, please. D is a joke compared too languages like C++ and Java. It's syntax is god-awful, it's execution is slow, and it doesn't have nearly the amount of features that other languages have.

TRANS LIVES MATTER

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's syntax is god-awful, it's execution is slow, and it doesn't have nearly the amount of features that other languages have.

fite me irl, the syntax is amazing, execution is snappy and it's overflowing with features. Literally so many features half of them aren't finished or don't work to spec. Does ur c++ and java have that?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

She's written in python, she's just mad that you're sweet talking another language.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've unironically wrote my own std lib for python in D.

Such is the powar of Dlang

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

std lib

whats that?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Standard library. The built in functions of the program.

Mine was super shit but still

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Your comment is idiotic and proves that you have no idea what you're talking about. C++ and Java are both incredibly versatile languages that can be used for a wide variety of purposes. They both have their own strengths and weaknesses, but too say that one is better than the other is just ignorant.

TRANS LIVES MATTER

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They want to attract all the :!marseytrain:s and other types of mentally ill and neurotic people for some woke clout.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Javascript master race :marseygigachad: types? Sound like pain, me just use what I want and return null if no have good.


:#marseytwerking:

:marseycoin::marseycoin::marseycoin:
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

so it's a WIP unsafe rust with no tooling or community, but it has a bit better c++ interop

:#marseylaugh:

just stick with c++ or work on rust-c++ interop

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Dynamically sized array, like C++

Type is literally "Array"

What if it doesn't need to be a dynamic array? Is there any meta programming like C++? Is this a C++ replacement or is it just pointlessly comparing itself to C++

...

meme/hobby language, move along. Learn something else

![](/images/16582506434392834.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Anything without compile time function execution and string mixins is a meme language, yes this includes C

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

TIL about string mixings. just last week I was just coding something similarly but did it manually by filling strings and recompiling it manually.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I disagree. Computers are extremely fast, but lots of things aren't perfect. Even interpreted languages are nice because they are convenient to program in and easily extensible, it just matters how you do it.

Compile time function execution is great and I love it, but it's not a necessity and really doesn't actually benefit programs as much as one would think. It can make code more difficult to read in some cases, such as C++, where anything below C++20 has template definitions looking awful and difficult to manage. All compile time does is take things that are done in runtime and move them to compile time, theoretically anything can be done at "build-time" in any language, as long as it's bundled it. Sometimes I like to bundle small files into C programs for portability, which is essentially done at build time. Unfortunately, compile time just doesn't work in a major amount of situations.

String mixins are great though, I am working on a C CGI applications and god I hate C strings. Sometimes they are okay with the Standard library functions but for the most part they are awful to work with in practice. I consider compile time functions to be a micro-optimizer's dream, but in the real world, most of these compile time optimizations mean nothing, even to embedded programming

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseywoah:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyelliotrodger2:

Snapshots:

Orange site discussion:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.