Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseylaugh: you have no idea what you're talking about

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Point me to even one consistent style-sheet produced by an AI that isn't either 1. two existing ideas mashed together or 2. a mush of preexisting art styles stirred together into a vaguely artistic mix with 0 intention or creativity whatsoever.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've been away was :marseygrass:

Have to admit I'm not interested in finding art for you. The same natural signals that people learn from are present in data used to tune these networks. This means symbolic associations are also learned (these internal representations aren't comprehensible to us for the most part).

Consider that these types of image models can often be easily configured to function as language models and vise versa. Unless you endeavour to understand the crazy shit these models accomplish, limit your argument to something like "machines don't have the human spirit"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.