I just asked for proof of direct hit of the hospital and they doing unreal mental gymnastics like what's wrong with them ?
@IraniumDonGER seriously how did they even finished school if they can answer a simple question ? Or they didn't even finished it ? It's been now 5 days and no proofs and no open investigation.
Asking for proof of direct hit shows me a 3D model
This is the hospital and if 5300lb directly hit it than there is pictures where that building is turned into dust
He answered to this comment with 3D model. I didn't claimed it was Russian or Ukrainian missile I just asked for proof that 5300lb missile directly hit that hospital.
And they will claim they smart when they can straight answer a simple question
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Are you ?
I don't claim you can use edited video as primary evidence that it's Russian missile while you are doing it.
Ukraine asked ICC to open a case against Russia that it was Russian missile and that Russia is committing genocide.
ICC didn't opened a case, and in nato summit the event was thrown into trash can.
While you genius when ICC couldn't blame Russian with all their lawyers think you are smarter than all of them and have proof it's Russia
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So it's a KH-101.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why you so low IQ ?
I clearly stated edited videos are never a proof
This is from law book and it's same no mater if it's common laws, civil laws, custom laws or mixed laws or the jurisdiction location
You don't understand basic laws, claims to have proofs yet don't understand how proofs work, then claims that I told things that I didn't.
You are legit low iq idiot
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Have you provided any evidence it's an edited video?
So you can't show its an edited video.
We ain't in a court, and it's the same video the still you're using to show it's an AMRAAM is from.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
All the videos posted online have some edits. I legit doubt og video with all the metadata's even exist. Because it's illegal in Ukraine to film airstrikes and AD work. So posting unedited video would be the last thing you'll want to do.
It's you who need to prove it's legit video and you posted a clearly AI upscale picture and video with some artificial pixels behaviour on top of it you don't have the metadata's.
This is chronology of this case:
Ukraine suggest it's Russian kh101 missiles
Russia says no
Ukraine ask ICC for help
ICC ignores Ukraine
Ukrainecask NATO help
NATO doesn't help
Case close
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, I really don't. You are the one claiming that it is edited and the features of a KH-101 are fake. You have to prove that.
Every post is more
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes every of your new post is just more cope and proof of your low IQ, you are the accuser and the rule says innocent until proven other wise like you homo know pretty well you have no metadata's or the original video and ask me to prove like how low IQ are you ?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're the OP, you are making claims.
I write two or three sentences.
You write two or three paragraphs and fail to address any actual points brought up.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Point you are an idiot, how should I even address it ?
That's legit not how things work, saying Russia is not guilty is defender point and at default state: presumption of innocence. You come with an edited video without meta date and even show ai upscaled picture and don't understand that those things ain't any evidence.
But my main post claim is ICC or other international organisations didn't opened any investigation about this hospital and the whole case was thrown into garbage. This automatically proves Russia is not guilty.
In all those days you just prove you don't understand how things work
You have 13000 coins, do you want to bet on them that ICC will open a case and prove its Russian missile ?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context