Death to ziggers
No email address required.
If you are ambushing someone, they would clearly be armed and combat-ready, so you are attacking a hostile force.
That's not a requirement. You can ambush unarmed enemy soldiers who believe they are completely safe.
Fair enough, I will retract that point. The first one still stands. As well as the two I linked later. The one without a video I will also concede to be anecdotal evidence.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If you are ambushing someone, they would clearly be armed and combat-ready, so you are attacking a hostile force.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's not a requirement. You can ambush unarmed enemy soldiers who believe they are completely safe.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Fair enough, I will retract that point. The first one still stands. As well as the two I linked later. The one without a video I will also concede to be anecdotal evidence.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context