https://old.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/z0e1to/welldamn
/u/Microwave_Lesbian, active in /r/latebloomerlesbians which seems like a massive cope sub for to find each other
Reminds me of Bernie bros seething over "low information voters"
/u/Microwave_Lesbian, active in /r/latebloomerlesbians which seems like a massive cope sub for to find each other
Reminds me of Bernie bros seething over "low information voters"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You didn't understand the analogy. Preventing a large-scale bottleneck would be the argument for forced pregnancy. That does not mean it is the argument for forced vaccinations. The argument for those would be that individuals will die preventable deaths. On each side of this analogy, we are pointing to the specific reasoning for each argument. For the analogy to work, the reasoning must be the same. Here we see that the reasoning is different. That is why the analogy fails.
You're going to be so psyked when you buy your first legal beer.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
in an alternate universe:
by accident you've locked someone in a cell and lost the key. this happened in a lonely place far away from other people. it will take nine months before a lock smith can come and free her.
until then, your accidental prisoner depends on you for survival. you need to bring her water and food, otherwise she will die.
what a chore! collecting twice as much food and carrying hers to her cell all the time is an impairment of your bodily integrity! it's also slightly dangerous: there is a 1 in 10000 chance you might die trying to keep that stupid prisoner alive.
thankfully your world is full of idiots who lock people up by accident and lose the keys, and they have written tomes about how it's totally not their responsibility.
the tomes explain that it is your right as a wahmmen to kill the prisoners, because keeping her alive is affecting your body and even threatens your life a little bit.
so you kill her. but it's not murder!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This discussion went from asking if the right to abortion for women is simultaneously an argument for men to decline parental responsibility. You are now arguing about the morality of abortion itself. That's a separate discussion.
If you choose to go to college, please make it a point to take a few philosophy courses. Alternatively, find an old intro to philosophy book and read it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context