Reported by:

History-cels despair as their faculty numbers plummet:marseyfeynman::marseynietzsche::marseypharaohcat:

https://twitter.com/BretDevereaux/status/1603885980154531840

As you'd expect, of course someone brings up domination of leftoid/radlib ideologues as the reason for pushing people away.

It was evident two decades ago that academic historians were hollowing out their profession by elevating ideology & fads over the needs of students, public & long-term interests of univ & discipline. These figures are sad but reflect a generation of professional irresponsibility.

And it predictably it casues seethe from a lot of totally not leftist History-cels including a POC historian who says it's due to lack of funding.

This is a completely incorrect account of why the discipline declined in the academy. Historyโ€™s demise reflects the financialization of higher education & the decline of public/private support for humanities research. It has nothing to do with โ€œideology.โ€

Yeah "financialization". History in the past was a field where some talented polymath did all the research as a hobby. There's a very good reason why most people aren't interested in funding mediocre ideologues and their rants.

Goes on a long screed about how it's "finance capitalisms" fault while simultaneously arguing about how they should've convinced more billionaires to donate for their """"""research"""""".

![](/images/16718063806694841.webp)

Some dude suggests offering more military history courses which would be cooler and that doesn't go well.

The popularity of history podcasts show this is self-inflicted. Why don't more colleges, for example, offer military history?

Terrible take. Podcasts are entertainment that might be informative on the side.

And you get +++ military history when studying a specific region/era.

But one teacher canโ€™t cover โ€œevery cool battle in all of historyโ€ with anything like depth or intellectual integrity.

Anyway. Lots of copium in there as they witness the slow decline of their field.

169
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I didnt mean the publication, I meant that particular article. I just skimmed it but it looks like its just boring econ history mixed with leftoid sneed. Doesnt even have buzzwords smh

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

it looks like its just boring econ history mixed with leftoid sneed

Yeah that's what academic Marxism is.

And there's buzzwords

>The capitalist perpetrator deception continues in a neoliberal One Percenter-dominated world that is existentially threatened by nuclear weapons

>ls. History ignored yields history repeated.(6) Peace is the only way but silence kills and silence is complicity.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Its not academic Marxism unless they say "material basis" at least 3 times, CMV

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

J. Sakai is the only academic Marxist I read.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.