Reported by:

:schopenmarsey: :marseybigbrain: ETHICS DEBATE #3: Now I Am Become Death :marseyoppenheimer: :marseynukegoggles:

Alright, no more discussion of the limits of free trade. Let's talk about technology. I saw a lively debate on here between @TheTroubleWithPibbles, @August, @Geralt_of_Uganda, etc, about whether it is ethical to develop technologies...

Scenario

This, of course, actually happened

J. Robert Oppenheimer was a brilliant scientist.

being so brilliant, he was able to conceive of, and help build, the greatest weapon known to mankind - the atomic bomb.

Oppenheimer, of course, didn't know the long term consequences of developing such a weapon - but he understood the sheer destructive potential of such a device.

Your question is: Was Oppenheimer acting ethically by assisting to develop the atomic bomb?

NOTE: In this hypothetical, history is at a crossroads. You don't know what will happen in the future - whether the device you created will be used to end life on earth or to usher in a new golden age.

138
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Human beings aren't rational actors, and in this scenario you don't know what nukes are going to be like.

The researchers at Los Alamos predicted that the detonation of an atomic bomb could ignite the atmosphere and cause deaths across the entire globe. They still pursued it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Could. The invention of fire could have angered the gods for stealing their secrets and caused them to snuff out the sun, yet people still pursued it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

People pursued fire because they were too stupid to know any better. They thought fire would give them power, but all it did was anger the gods. Now the whole world is plunged into darkness because of their foolishness.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.